Skip to content
recurance

Delayed discharge due to lack of suitable care home placement

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high4 reports · 2020–2026 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Department of Health and Social Care received 4 coroners' reports about this hazard between 30 Jul 2020 and 7 May 2026.

They came from 2 different coroners in 3 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 3 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 3 of the 3 earlier reports, stating 3 specific actions.

4
reports
2
different coroners
2020–2026
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Reginald Collins↗

    30 Jul 2020 · Alison Mutch · Manchester South

    “The inquest heard that Mr [name redacted] could have been discharged from 19th September when he was medically optimised. However he remained in an acute hospital setting until his death on 22nd 1 October because of the challenges of finding a suitable EMI placement for him.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Department of Health and Social Care responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “a GM Discharge Pathway and good Discharge to Assess (D2A) system in place”
  2. 9 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Alan Massam↗

    26 Apr 2021 · Alison Mutch · Manchester South

    “there was a significant pressure to find another home that would accept him.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Department of Health and Social Care responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “We are continuing to drive increased integration between health and social care by removing barriers to data sharing and enabling joint decision-making”
  3. 3 years 5 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    George Coulthard↗

    24 Sept 2024 · Alison Mutch · South Manchester

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “Mr [name redacted] was assessed as being suitable for discharge on 18th December. He remained in an acute hospital setting for a further 4 weeks due to challenges in identifying a suitable care home.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:suitableremainedacutehospitalsettingchallenges

    Department of Health and Social Care responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “the Greater Manchester NHS Foundation Trust agrees that, although it can take time to complete all the necessary arrangements for a safe and appropriate transfer of care for someone with complex needs, the time from a decision that Mr [name redacted] was medically optimised (18 December 2023) to his actual transfer to Hilltop Hall Nursing Home (11 January 2024) was too long.”

    Stated timescale: 18 December 2023 to 11 January 2024

  4. 1 year 7 months later

    Raised again · 3rd time

    Elsie Jones↗

    7 May 2026 · Louise Hunt · Birmingham and Solihull

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “The inquest heard evidence that patients who suffer from severe dementia who need specialist placements often spend many months in hospital whilst funding and suitable placements are being found.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:inquestheardhospitalsuitable

    Department of Health and Social Care responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

  5. All reports to Department of Health and Social Care

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error