Skip to content
recurance

Alan Massam

26 Apr 2021 · Coroner Alison Mutch · Manchester South

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of inter-agency information sharing

    “there was no clear agreement or arrangement between agencies as to how to effectively share information in complex cases”
  2. 2. absence of national discharge protocol

    “there is no national guidance/protocol about what an acute trust should do if attempts to contact a home are unsuccessful or about the obligation to ensure the home can accept him back”
  3. 3. lack of escalation process for medication refusal

    “there was no defined escalation process which would ensure that the risk this presented was recognised and acted on”
  4. 4. insufficient suitable care home beds

    “significant pressure to find another home that would accept him.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningRichard Jones20 Feb 2015 · 6 years 2 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“As to how that information is shared with other agencies involved in the care of that patient to ensure that it is accurately passed on, particularly as to the level of risk and degree of urgency.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“there was no clear agreement or arrangement between agencies as to how to effectively share information in complex cases”
Full chain: Inadequate inter-agency communication about risk and urgency
Raised again laterGeorge Coulthard24 Sept 2024 · 3 years 5 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“there was a significant pressure to find another home that would accept him.”

Later report

“He remained in an acute hospital setting for a further 4 weeks due to challenges in identifying a suitable care home.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Delayed discharge due to lack of suitable care home placement

Responses

2021-0120-Response-from-CQC-Redacted.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

2021-0120-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-Social-Care-Redacted.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

Stated action

“We are continuing to drive increased integration between health and social care by removing barriers to data sharing and enabling joint decision-making”

2021-0120-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-Redacted.pdf ↗· Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership and Care Quality Commission

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error