Skip to content
recurance

Michael Folley

21 Jun 2019 · Coroner Karen Harrold · Hampshire (Central)

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. use of carbonated paper PER form

    “The current PER form uses carbonated paper and is a pilot system adopted by only two police forces in the UK. It has been in use for 2.5 to 3 years and a national working group has suggested moving towards an electronic system but this has not been implemented.”
  2. 2. missing SASH completion

    “The suicide/self harm warning alert (SASH) at page 9 of the PER was meant to be completed if there was a risk of self-harm or suicide since arrest or within the last month. In other words, it was felt the relevant period to be considered was not just the current period of detention but also anything relevant within a month before arrest.”
  3. 3. inadequate GEOAmey engagement in PER

    “the impression created was that GEOAmey staff do not actively engage in and contribute to the contents of the PER to highlight any information relevant to risk assessment irrespective of what source it comes from.”
  4. 4. missing call logging system

    “The electronic PER had been checked and nothing was logged. There is no reason to believe s call was not made and it is of concern that there was no apparent system for logging such a call let alone action in the contents of her request.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningSheldon Woodford16 May 2016 · 3 years 1 month earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“That in the reception process the SASH document is not identifiable to all relevant staff.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“The suicide/self harm warning alert (SASH) at page 9 of the PER was meant to be completed if there was a risk of self-harm or suicide since arrest or within the last month. In other words, it was felt the relevant period to be considered was not just the current period of detention but also anything relevant within a month before arrest.”
Full chain: SASH form not identified or completed at reception
Raised again laterHaydar Jefferies20 Dec 2024 · 5 years 6 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“The electronic PER had been checked and nothing was logged. There is no reason to believe s call was not made and it is of concern that there was no apparent system for logging such a call”

Later report

“There is no system in place to ensure that information provided in telephone calls in relation to a prisoner's welfare is recorded.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Missing call logging system for prisoner welfare

Responses

2019-0230-Response-by-CNWL-NHS-Trust.pdf ↗· Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error