Skip to content
recurance

James Kane

15 Jul 2016 · Coroner Andrew Tweddle · County Durham and Darlington

This report repeats 1 earlier warning. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. drain insertion without ultrasound scan

    “Notwithstanding that a local discussion of the circumstances of this case has taken place and there having been no local support for a change in policy or guidance, given the evidence that the deceased would not have died when he did but for the drain and that it is possible that a scan may have reduced the risk of death”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningGerald Werrett1 Aug 2014 · 1 year 11 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

Earlier report

“Mr. [name redacted] was not examined prior to the insertion of the chest drain.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“given the evidence that the deceased would not have died when he did but for the drain”
Full chain: Chest drain insertion without pre-procedure checks

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error