Skip to content
recurance

Gerald Werrett

1 Aug 2014 · Coroner M E Voisin · Avon

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. mislabelled chest x-rays leading to wrong side chest drain insertion

    “Chest drains are inserted by a number of medical disciplines and clearly this event has shown that basic failures can have catastrophic consequences”
  2. 2. incorrectly labelled chest x-rays

    “Both chest x-rays were incorrectly labelled, and this error was not identied by the clinician The”
  3. 3. misinterpretation of cardiac silhouette

    “The cardiac silhouette was not interpreted correctly”
  4. 4. insertion of chest drain without prior clinical examination

    “Mr. [name redacted] was not examined prior to the insertion of the chest drain”

Linked reports

Raised again laterJames Kane15 Jul 2016 · 1 year 11 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“Mr. [name redacted] was not examined prior to the insertion of the chest drain.”

Later report

“given the evidence that the deceased would not have died when he did but for the drain”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Chest drain insertion without pre-procedure checks

Responses

2014-0355-Response-by-Department-of-Health.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

2014-0355-Response-by-The-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists.pdf ↗· Royal College of Anaesthetists

Stated action · next review

“we will ensure particular attention is attached to correct site location at the next review.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error