Skip to content
recurance

David Moore

3 Dec 2019 · Coroner Jeremy Chipperfield · County Durham and Darlington

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. de facto pedestrian crossing point on unlit road with 60mph speed limit

    “section of the A693 where the collision occurred is: - a de facto pedestrian crossing point connecting footpaths intersecting that road; - an area to which the national speed limit applies (60mph for cars); - very dark at night, being unaffected by ambient illumination; - without street lighting The material section of road is a natural crossing point for pedestrians travelling between two footpaths leading between the collision site: and (i) the village of No Place, to the south of the A693 and (ii”

Linked reports

Raised again laterBartosz Kusiak10 Jul 2020 · 7 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“very dark at night, being unaffected by ambient illumination; - without street lighting”

Later report

“unlit dual carriageway subject to the national speed limit that runs alongside a housing estate and an industrial estate in Belmont.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Pedestrians crossing unlit dual carriageway at 60mph speed limit

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error