Skip to content
recurance

Pedestrians crossing unlit dual carriageway at 60mph speed limit

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate2 reports · 2019–2020 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Durham County Council received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 3 Dec 2019 and 10 Jul 2020.

They came from 2 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2019–2020
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    David Moore↗

    3 Dec 2019 · Jeremy Chipperfield · County Durham and Darlington

    “very dark at night, being unaffected by ambient illumination; - without street lighting”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Durham County Council responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  2. 7 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Bartosz Kusiak↗

    10 Jul 2020 · Oliver Longstaff · County Durham and Darlington

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “unlit dual carriageway subject to the national speed limit that runs alongside a housing estate and an industrial estate in Belmont.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Durham County Council responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Durham County Council

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error