Skip to content
recurance

Darren Turner

17 Mar 2025 · Coroner Sean Horstead · Essex

This report repeats 2 earlier warnings, and was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inadequate care plan updates

    “Failures in Care Planning: specifically, a failure to appropriately up-date and document matters relating to [the deceased]'s Care Plan consistent with Trust policy. The last up-date to his Care Plan was 12 days prior to discharge.”
  2. 2. inadequate electronic records

    “Failures in Documentation: in a number of acknowledged respects the electronic records were inadequate - and inconsistent with EPUT policy - with evidence of the 'cutting and pasting' of entries including [the deceased]'s initial 72-hour care plan containing details of another patient entirely.”
  3. 3. inadequate risk assessment documentation

    “Failures in Risk Assessments: specifically, failures to appropriately up-date and document matters relating to [the deceased]'s risk assessment consistent with Trust policy. Relevant passive and active risk factors were not formally reflected in his documented risk assessments. Evidence from his Responsible Consultant [name redacted] and the discharging Psychiatrist confirmed that, had they been aware of a disclosure made by [the deceased] to his key worker/nurse prior to discharge, the Section 2 detention would not”
  4. 4. failure to allocate care coordinator

    “Failure to allocate a Care Coordinator as required under the Care Programme Approach (CPA) and as mandated by EPUT policy. This failure (resulting from significant human error not detected by an insufficiently robust system and not therefore corrected prior to the death- and in respect of which no DATIX was ever raised) was a feature that contributed to the serious failure in discharge planning in this case.”
  5. 5. inadequate communication with family

    “Failures in Communication including a failure to appropriately liaise with the deceased's Family and, specifically, [the deceased]'s mother to establish the suitability and safety of a discharge to her address not least in the context of [the deceased]'s disclosure that discharge to his mother's home might”
  6. 6. inadequate discharge planning and execution

    “f) Failures in Discharge Planning and Execution: specifically, in addition to the features above, a failure to actively reconsider the safety of the discharge on the afternoon of the 17th October in light of the disclosure from [the deceased]'s mother that she would not, as had been previously indicated, be able to either collect [the deceased] from the Ward or be at her home when he was discharged. There was no evidence of how, in fact, [the deceased] even left the Unit. It is likely that the chaotic and unsupported nature”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningTimothy Shaw15 Feb 2018 · 7 years 1 month earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The standard and accuracy of record keeping by both disciplinary and Healthcare staff needs to be improved.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“in a number of acknowledged respects the electronic records were inadequate - and inconsistent with EPUT policy - with evidence of the 'cutting and pasting' of entries”
Full chain: Inadequate risk assessment documentation and inaccurate record keeping
Repeats an earlier warningStephanie Moyce25 Feb 2022 · 3 years 1 month earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

Earlier report

“Evidence confirmed a conspicuous lack of clarity as to who, amongst EPUT clinicians/staff, is responsible for ensuring that a clear and comprehensive discharge plan is formulated”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“(d) Failure to allocate a Care Coordinator as required under the Care Programme Approach (CPA) and as mandated by EPUT policy.”
Full chain: Lack of discharge plan responsibility and unclear care coordinator allocation
Raised again laterKatharine Corrigan1 Jun 2026 · 1 year 2 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high

This report

“Failures in Risk Assessments: specifically, failures to appropriately up-date and document matters relating to [the deceased]'s risk assessment consistent with Trust policy.”

Later report

“Ms [name redacted] risk assessment and care plans had not been appropriately updated in her medical records such that:”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate risk assessment documentation and inaccurate record keeping

Responses

2025-0144-Response-from-Essex-Partnership-University-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf ↗· Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust

Stated action

“We can provide assurance that there is an expectation that care plans are reviewed as a minimum weekly or following any incidents or change. To further support this changes are being made to ensure care plans are discussed at the weekly MDTs.”

Stated action

“The Trust has initiated a Record Keeping Safety Improvement Programme (SIP). Part of this includes considering how to address issues of copying and pasting.”

Stated action

“A reflective learning supervision session has been held with a member of staff involved in this matter in order to understand the factors in this incident and ensure the staff member understands the importance of communication key information to other clinicians.”

Stated action

“The Trust is rolling out STORM Training (Skills Training on Risk Management).”

Stated action

“The Trust has initiated a MDT Communication SIP due to the findings from patient safety incident investigations. A working group has been established consisting of senior clinicians and service directors to develop key principles for effective MDT working/communication and documentation.”

Stated action

“The Trust is continuing focus care planning and will be holding a dedicated Care Unit Local Quality and Safety Group to spotlight”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error