Inadequate risk assessment documentation and inaccurate record keeping
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust received 6 coroners' reports about this hazard between 15 Feb 2018 and 1 Jun 2026.
They came from 4 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 5 times after the first warning.
A published response was found for 5 of the 5 earlier reports, stating 9 specific actions.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“- The standard and accuracy of record keeping by both disciplinary and Healthcare staff needs to be improved.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗
- 6 years 5 months later
“There was no evidence of any adequate formulation of risk prior to [the deceased]'s discharge from hospital on the 14 December 2022 and no evidence of any adequate risk formulation prior to [the deceased]'s discharge from the community mental health team in January 2023.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗
“The Trust have made improvements, at pace in respect of the processes for formulation of risk on discharge with the implementation of discharge steps developed by the Trust Patient Flow Team. There has also been a change in practice to ensure we hold a discharge planning meeting with the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) before discharge from hospital. Clinical service managers and matrons join discharge meetings to ensure a collaborative approach.”
Stated timescale: 26th September 2024
Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way
Multi-Disciplinary Discharge Coordination Team to Overcome Discharge Barriers and Address the Risk of Delayed Discharges ↗ - 8 months laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
“in a number of acknowledged respects the electronic records were inadequate - and inconsistent with EPUT policy - with evidence of the 'cutting and pasting' of entries”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 6 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗
“We can provide assurance that there is an expectation that care plans are reviewed as a minimum weekly or following any incidents or change. To further support this changes are being made to ensure care plans are discussed at the weekly MDTs.”
Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way
Essex Integrated Care Board - Board Meeting - 15 October 2026 ↗“The Trust has initiated a Record Keeping Safety Improvement Programme (SIP). Part of this includes considering how to address issues of copying and pasting.”
Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust Priorities 2025/26 | What the Board Is Focused On ↗4 more stated actions in the Promises tab.
- 2 months laterIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
“There was a lack of professional curiosity and poor record keeping and rationale for decision-making.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:recordkeeping
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗
“The Trust has continued to review our assessment processes to ensure that the appropriate reviews are undertaken in a timely manner and are supported through the MDT approach which then supports a joined up approach to patient assessments. Staff in the Mental Health Crisis team are required to undertake a mental health assessment for all patients, which is monitored and audited via supervision meetings and compliance reviews.”
Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way
Board papers - Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust ↗ - 6 months laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
“including: Communication; Training & Supervision; Record Keeping; Discharge Planning; Care Planning; Risk Assessment.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:DischargeRisk
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗
“We have now reached a stage where our Lived Experience Ambassadors have worked alongside us throughout this journey and are actively supporting the recommendations for the Complex Needs Pathway within community mental health services-an area that would traditionally have been managed under the CPA framework.”
Web search (Tavily): Evidence found that the action was carried out
Patient Experience - Essex Partnership University ... ↗ - 6 months laterClosely relatedConfidence 0.92 · higha different coroner
“Ms [name redacted] risk assessment and care plans had not been appropriately updated in her medical records such that:”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:riskassessmentappropriately
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗
- All reports to Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2018 → 2025Darren Turner7 years 1 month after Timothy Shaw · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports highlight problems with the quality and reliability of clinical documentation and record‑keeping within the trust. The later report specifies concrete examples such as cut‑and‑paste errors, while the earlier report calls for general improvement in record‑keeping standards.
Timothy Shaw · 15 Feb 2018
“The standard and accuracy of record keeping by both disciplinary and Healthcare staff needs to be improved.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Darren Turner · 17 Mar 2025
“in a number of acknowledged respects the electronic records were inadequate - and inconsistent with EPUT policy - with evidence of the 'cutting and pasting' of entries”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ 2018 → 2025Julie Beasley7 years 3 months after Timothy Shaw · different coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports highlight deficiencies in the standard and accuracy of record keeping by healthcare staff. The later report specifies that poor record keeping accompanied a lack of professional curiosity in assessing risk.
Timothy Shaw · 15 Feb 2018
“- The standard and accuracy of record keeping by both disciplinary and Healthcare staff needs to be improved.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Julie Beasley · 28 May 2025
“There was a lack of professional curiosity and poor record keeping and rationale for decision-making.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ 2024 → 2025Stuart Berry1 year 4 months after Danny Anderson · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports highlight insufficient risk formulation and discharge planning processes within the trust.
Danny Anderson · 25 Jul 2024
“There was no evidence of any adequate formulation of risk prior to [the deceased]'s discharge from hospital on the 14 December 2022 and no evidence of any adequate risk formulation prior to [the deceased]'s discharge from the community mental health team in January 2023.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Stuart Berry · 1 Dec 2025
“including: Communication; Training & Supervision; Record Keeping; Discharge Planning; Care Planning; Risk Assessment.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ 2025 → 2026Katharine Corrigan1 year 2 months after Darren Turner · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · highBoth reports highlight failures to keep patients' risk assessments and care plans up‑to‑date and accurately documented.
Darren Turner · 17 Mar 2025
“Failures in Risk Assessments: specifically, failures to appropriately up-date and document matters relating to [the deceased]'s risk assessment consistent with Trust policy.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Katharine Corrigan · 1 Jun 2026
“Ms [name redacted] risk assessment and care plans had not been appropriately updated in her medical records such that:”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Stated action in the response to the earlier report
“The Trust has initiated a Record Keeping Safety Improvement Programme (SIP). Part of this includes considering how to address issues of copying and pasting.”
2024 → 2026Katharine Corrigan1 year 10 months after Danny Anderson · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · highBoth reports highlight failures in conducting proper risk assessments and updating care plans based on patient information.
Danny Anderson · 25 Jul 2024
“There was no evidence of any adequate formulation of risk prior to [the deceased]'s discharge from hospital on the 14 December 2022 and no evidence of any adequate risk formulation prior to [the deceased]'s discharge from the community mental health team in January 2023.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Katharine Corrigan · 1 Jun 2026
“Ms [name redacted] risk assessment and care plans had not been appropriately updated in her medical records such that: a. They had not been developed in collaboration with her and did not contain: i. Early waring signs and triggers”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Stated action in the response to the earlier report
“The Trust have made improvements, at pace in respect of the processes for formulation of risk on discharge with the implementation of discharge steps developed by the Trust Patient Flow Team. There has also been a change in practice to ensure we hold a discharge planning meeting with the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) before discharge from hospital. Clinical service managers and matrons join discharge meetings to ensure a collaborative approach.”
2025 → 2026Katharine Corrigan6 months after Stuart Berry · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderateBoth reports highlight failures to keep risk assessments and care plans up‑to‑date and properly documented in patients’ records. The earlier case concerns Mr [name redacted]’s outdated risk assessment; the later case concerns Ms [name redacted]’s missing early warning signs and inaccurate information.
Stuart Berry · 1 Dec 2025
“(c) Failures in Risk Assessments: specifically, failures to appropriately up- date and document matters relating to Mr [name redacted] risk assessment consistent with Trust policy.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Katharine Corrigan · 1 Jun 2026
“6. Ms [name redacted] risk assessment and care plans had not been appropriately updated in her medical records such that:”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ 2025 → 2026Katharine Corrigan1 year after Julie Beasley · same coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderateBoth reports highlight failures to keep risk assessments and care plans up to date and to document important clinical information.
Julie Beasley · 28 May 2025
“Multiple experienced members of the mental health teams had contact with Mrs [name redacted] between January and March and did not make detailed entries into the medical”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Katharine Corrigan · 1 Jun 2026
“Ms [name redacted] risk assessment and care plans had not been appropriately updated in her medical records such that:”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Stated action in the response to the earlier report
“The Trust has continued to review our assessment processes to ensure that the appropriate reviews are undertaken in a timely manner and are supported through the MDT approach which then supports a joined up approach to patient assessments. Staff in the Mental Health Crisis team are required to undertake a mental health assessment for all patients, which is monitored and audited via supervision meetings and compliance reviews.”
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
Stated action · timescale: 26th September 2024
“The Trust have made improvements, at pace in respect of the processes for formulation of risk on discharge with the implementation of discharge steps developed by the Trust Patient Flow Team. There has also been a change in practice to ensure we hold a discharge planning meeting with the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) before discharge from hospital. Clinical service managers and matrons join discharge meetings to ensure a collaborative approach.”
What happened next: No evidence found either way
The Trust outlined discharge planning improvements and a target date of 26 September 2024, but no source confirms these actions were completed by that date.
“The purpose of this study is to describe the development and implementation of a multidisciplinary team intervention to overcome discharge barriers for patients with prolonged hospitalization.”
No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.
Stated action
“We can provide assurance that there is an expectation that care plans are reviewed as a minimum weekly or following any incidents or change. To further support this changes are being made to ensure care plans are discussed at the weekly MDTs.”
What happened next: No evidence found either way
The organisation's statement about reviewing care plans weekly or after incidents was not confirmed or denied in the provided sources.
“Welcome to this uh meeting of the Essics Integrated Care Board. Um uh warm [0:21] welcome to the members of the public who've joined us here in Southend. Um and also to those who've joined us [0:29] online, a polite reminder to everyone that this is a meeting which is held”
“Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust This is an organisation that runs the health and social care services we inspect”
“Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust ESSEX PARTNERSHIP UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2020-21 | ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2020-21 2 | ESSEX PARTNERSHIP UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST (EPUT) ESSEX PARTNERSHIP UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST (EPUT) | 3 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2020-21 | ESSEX PARTNERSHIP UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST ANNUAL REPORT AND”
No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.
Stated action
“The Trust has initiated a Record Keeping Safety Improvement Programme (SIP). Part of this includes considering how to address issues of copying and pasting.”
What happened next: No evidence found either way
The Trust's priorities page does not mention a Record Keeping Safety Improvement Programme or any specific initiative addressing copying and pasting.
“What is Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust's digital transformation strategy? What procurement signals are in Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust's board papers? What are Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust's workforce challenges?”
No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.
Stated action
“A reflective learning supervision session has been held with a member of staff involved in this matter in order to understand the factors in this incident and ensure the staff member understands the importance of communication key information to other clinicians.”
What happened next: No evidence found either way
The organisation's website does not mention any reflective learning supervision session or related staff training.
“Join a free 1.5hr information briefing tofind out more about Trauma Informed Practice and how it could work in your setting”
“The University of Essex and East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (ESNEFT) have officially joined forces in a new partnership to promote greater collaboration in the areas of health and wellbeing.”
No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.
Stated action
“The Trust is rolling out STORM Training (Skills Training on Risk Management).”
What happened next: No evidence found either way
The document does not specify a rollout timeline for STORM Training.
“Presentation: Time to Care and Partnership Working”
No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.
Stated action
“The Trust has initiated a MDT Communication SIP due to the findings from patient safety incident investigations. A working group has been established consisting of senior clinicians and service directors to develop key principles for effective MDT working/communication and documentation.”
What happened next: No evidence found either way
The Trust's website and related news coverage discuss the Lampard Inquiry and mental health services but do not mention any MDT Communication SIP or related working group.
“Infrared technology is used in patients' bedrooms and can monitor their breathing and pulse.”
“We can provide emotional and wellbeing support for anyone affected by the Lampard Inquiry. [Find support”
“The first three mental health foundation trusts have been authorised in England. Monitor, the UK's independent regulator of NHS foundation trusts, has named them as Oxleas NHS Foundation Tru”
No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.
Stated action
“The Trust is continuing focus care planning and will be holding a dedicated Care Unit Local Quality and Safety Group to spotlight”
What happened next: No evidence found either way
The Trust was asked to address concerns about inpatient deaths and safety standards, but no evidence was found that a dedicated Care Unit Local Quality and Safety Group was held to spotlight care planning.
“[name redacted], interim chief executive Essex Partnership Trust. Good afternoon.”
“The trust were asked to address immediate concerns in relation to regulation 12 (safe care and treatment), 13 (safeguarding) and 17 (good governance).”
No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.
Stated action
“The Trust has continued to review our assessment processes to ensure that the appropriate reviews are undertaken in a timely manner and are supported through the MDT approach which then supports a joined up approach to patient assessments. Staff in the Mental Health Crisis team are required to undertake a mental health assessment for all patients, which is monitored and audited via supervision meetings and compliance reviews.”
What happened next: No evidence found either way
The Trust's website and related documents describe its mental health crisis services and procedures but do not provide evidence of a specific promised action being carried out.
“Here you will find papers and minutes from our Board of Director meetings.”
“The Mental Health Urgent Care Department provides care, assessment and support to people with urgent mental health needs and in crisis, providing a calm and therapeutic space with access to mental health specialists.”
“The Trust monitors the implementation of and compliance with this procedure i”
No evidence found does not mean the action did not happen.
Stated action
“We have now reached a stage where our Lived Experience Ambassadors have worked alongside us throughout this journey and are actively supporting the recommendations for the Complex Needs Pathway within community mental health services-an area that would traditionally have been managed under the CPA framework.”
What happened next: Evidence found that the action was carried out
The organisation describes Lived Experience Ambassadors as actively supporting recommendations for the Complex Needs Pathway within community mental health services.
“The Patient Experience Portfolio offers a range of services that listen, support, and amplify your voice. Whether you're giving feedback, seeking advice, or getting involved directly, your experiences help shape better care for everyone.”
“Today's Health and Social Care Committee report on Community Mental Health Services is an important and timely reminder of what so many of us working in complex care already know: community-based mental health support saves lives, strengthens neighbourhoods, and offers people the dignity and continuity of care they deserve.”
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 → 2025 | 0.69 | 0.01 | Closely related · 0.90 | different |
| 2018 → 2025 | 0.67 | 0.07 | Identical · 0.90 | different |
| 2024 → 2025 | 0.68 | 0.04 | Closely related · 0.90 | different |
| 2025 → 2026 | 0.73 | 0.04 | Closely related · 0.92 | different |
| 2024 → 2026 | 0.71 | 0.01 | Closely related · 0.85 | different |
| 2025 → 2026 | 0.73 | 0.04 | Closely related · 0.80 | different |
| 2025 → 2026 | 0.69 | 0.06 | Closely related · 0.80 | same |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
Other chains for Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
- Incomplete investigation of patient observations2 reports · 2023–2025
- Absence of mental health liaison during 72‑hour hold and missing discharge note2 reports · 2024–2025
- Lack of discharge plan responsibility and unclear care coordinator allocation2 reports · 2022–2025
- Inability to access GP medication records across systems3 reports · 2021–2025
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.