Skip to content
recurance

Daniel Maher

18 Apr 2017 · Coroner Anna Crawford · Surrey

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inaccessible patient information across county boundaries

    “mental health professionals cannot access patient information which is held on the computerised systems of mental health services outside their own county”
  2. 2. lack of shared clinical records after referral

    “key paperwork, such as the clinical record of the s.136 assessment, is not routinely shared on the making of such referrals”

Linked reports

Raised again laterBarbara Woodman22 Dec 2023 · 6 years 8 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“The court was told that mental health professionals cannot access patient information which is held on the computerised systems of mental health services outside their own county.”

Later report

“The ability of mental health clinicians to gain a complete picture of Ms. [name redacted] medical history was hampered by the fact that the information management systems holding these records at her GP practice was not accessible to secondary mental health services.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inaccessible patient information across county boundaries

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error