Inaccessible patient information across county boundaries
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 18 Apr 2017 and 22 Dec 2023.
They came from 2 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.
No published response from Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust was found for the earlier reports.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“The court was told that mental health professionals cannot access patient information which is held on the computerised systems of mental health services outside their own county.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ No published response from Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust was found for this report.
- 6 years 8 months laterIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
“The ability of mental health clinicians to gain a complete picture of Ms. [name redacted] medical history was hampered by the fact that the information management systems holding these records at her GP practice was not accessible to secondary mental health services.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:mentalhealthinformationsystemsservices
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗
- All reports to Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2017 → 2023Barbara Woodman6 years 8 months after Daniel Maher · different coronerIdentical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports highlight that mental health staff cannot access patient information stored in external computerised systems, hindering effective care.
Daniel Maher · 18 Apr 2017
“The court was told that mental health professionals cannot access patient information which is held on the computerised systems of mental health services outside their own county.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Barbara Woodman · 22 Dec 2023
“The ability of mental health clinicians to gain a complete picture of Ms. [name redacted] medical history was hampered by the fact that the information management systems holding these records at her GP practice was not accessible to secondary mental health services.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
No published response from Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust was found for this report.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 → 2023 | 0.69 | 0.06 | Identical · 0.90 | different |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
Other chains for Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.