Skip to content
recurance

Unnecessary patient transfers without proper documentation

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate3 reports · 2017–2019No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust received 3 coroners' reports about this hazard between 8 Dec 2017 and 25 Oct 2019.

They came from 1 coroner in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 2 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 2 earlier reports, stating 0 specific actions.

3
reports
1
coroner
2017–2019
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Roger Saxby↗

    8 Dec 2017 · Veronica Hamilton-Deeley · Brighton and Hove

    “There are basic requirements for Staffing and resources for a vascular hub. Royal Sussex County Hospital does not meet these requirements.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  2. 7 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Rita Giles↗

    11 Jul 2018 · Veronica Hamilton-Deeley · Brighton & Hove

    “(1) Unnecessary transfers to and from the Princess Royal Hospital with no supporting paperwork.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust was found for this report.

  3. 1 year 3 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Jean Waghorn↗

    25 Oct 2019 · Veronica Hamilton-Deeley · Brighton and Hove

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “(1) Unnecessary and inappropriate transfers between the Royal Sussex County Hospital, the Princes Royal Hospital and the Royal Sussex County Hospital.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:UnnecessarytransfersRoyalHospital

    The most recent report. A response may not be due or published yet.

  4. All reports to Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error