Skip to content
recurance

Delayed DOLS processing and missing reassessment

Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high2 reports · 2015–2016No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Birmingham City Council received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 27 Aug 2015 and 3 Aug 2016.

They came from 2 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

No published response from Birmingham City Council was found for the earlier reports.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2015–2016
years
0.90
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Eliza Simpson↗

    27 Aug 2015 · Emma Brown · Birmingham and Solihull

    “The Roseneath Care Home appeared to have no system for ensuring that when deprivation of liberty safeguarding orders expired the client was re-assessed to determine whether the need for an order persisted and, where appropriate, seeking further order.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Birmingham City Council was found for this report.

  2. 11 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Winston Harris↗

    3 Aug 2016 · Louise Hunt · Birmingham and Solihull

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “The application for DOLS order was not processed before Mr [name redacted] death.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Birmingham City Council responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Birmingham City Council

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error