Skip to content
recurance

Recurring hazard (see the quoted concerns)

Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high2 reports · 2014–2019 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Metropolitan Police Service received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 28 Aug 2014 and 20 Nov 2019.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 4 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2014–2019
years
0.85
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Lauren Barfoot↗

    28 Aug 2014 · Lorna Tagliavini · London (Inner South)

    “There was a failure by the MPS Missing Person's Unit (Greenwich) to carry out an effective search for [the deceased] as a consequence of the lack of information not shared with the Unit”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Metropolitan Police Service responded, stating 4 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “A full and regularly updated list of persons by both the London Borough of Bexley Social Services and Ethelberi's Children's Services with whom a”
    “A tisk assessment report is required in preparation for any strategy meetings for missing looked after children”

    2 more stated actions in the Promises tab.

  2. 5 years 3 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Nimo Younis↗

    20 Nov 2019 · ME Hassell · London Inner (North)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · higha different coroner
    “C&l ward staff did not have a proper understanding of what key information they needed to provide the MPS in order to trigger a police missing person enquiry, or to escalate an existing enquiry.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:informationmissing

    The most recent report. A response may not be due or published yet.

  3. All reports to Metropolitan Police Service

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error