Skip to content
recurance

Inconsistent mental health emergency protocols across police forces

Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high2 reports · 2023–2026 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Metropolitan Police Service received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 12 Jun 2023 and 19 May 2026.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2023–2026
years
0.85
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Heather Findlay↗

    12 Jun 2023 · Mary Hassell · Inner North London

    “I heard that the MPS has already created a similar model under the resource and demand team. The protocol is called Affinity.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Metropolitan Police Service responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “Response The MPS currently has the Affinity Protocol in place and has done since September 2021.This is a collaborative partnership between local policing, NHS Trusts and mental health service providers, the aim of which is to achieve mutual understanding of each partner's responsibilities in respect of those patients detained under the Mental Health Act and who may abscond.”

    Stated timescale: September 2021

  2. 2 years 11 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Catherine Morgan↗

    19 May 2026 · Patricia Harding · Kent and Medway

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · higha different coroner
    “An overly rigid approach to the Right Care Right Person policy and affinity protocol resulted in a delayed deployment.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:affinityprotocol

    Metropolitan Police Service responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Metropolitan Police Service

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error