Inadequate transfer assessment and documentation
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 14 Sept 2023 and 11 Apr 2025.
They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.
A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 1 specific action.
The story, report by report
Spacing grows with the time between reports.
“The Health Board's Transfer of Care document at the time the transfer occurred did not include any detail or process as to how the transfer should occur.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗
“incidents. The Transfer and Discharge of Care Protocol has been revised to include explicit guidance relating to transfers of care between community teams. This includes the steps to be taken by the care coordinator, supporting administrative staff and the single point of access service (SPOA). Progression of this protocol through the Health Board ratification process is being led by the MH&LD Deputy Director of Nursing and progress is overseen by the MH&LD Policy and Procedure Group. The revised protocol”
Stated timescale: end of January 2024
- 1 year 7 months later
Raised again · 1st time
Patricia Catterall↗
11 Apr 2025 · John Gittins · North Wales (East and Central)
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner“That the process of assessment by the Nursing Home prior to the transfer of care to them was not sufficiently robust so as to ensure that all relevant information required for the safe care of a patient had been received and assessed”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Repeated from the earlier report:processtransfercare
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗
- All reports to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Each row is one judged link between an earlier and a later report. Open a row to read both quotes, found word for word in the originals.
2023 → 2025Patricia Catterall1 year 7 months after Richard Griffiths · different coronerClosely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · highBoth reports highlight deficiencies in the transfer of care process that could compromise patient safety. The earlier report focuses on missing detail in the Transfer of Care document, while the later report concerns inadequate pre‑transfer assessment by the nursing home.
Richard Griffiths · 14 Sept 2023
“The Health Board's Transfer of Care document at the time the transfer occurred did not include any detail or process as to how the transfer should occur.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Patricia Catterall · 11 Apr 2025
“That the process of assessment by the Nursing Home prior to the transfer of care to them was not sufficiently robust so as to ensure that all relevant information required for the safe care of a patient had been received and assessed”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗ Stated action in the response to the earlier report
“incidents. The Transfer and Discharge of Care Protocol has been revised to include explicit guidance relating to transfers of care between community teams. This includes the steps to be taken by the care coordinator, supporting administrative staff and the single point of access service (SPOA). Progression of this protocol through the Health Board ratification process is being led by the MH&LD Deputy Director of Nursing and progress is overseen by the MH&LD Policy and Procedure Group. The revised protocol”
Stated action · timescale: end of January 2024
“incidents. The Transfer and Discharge of Care Protocol has been revised to include explicit guidance relating to transfers of care between community teams. This includes the steps to be taken by the care coordinator, supporting administrative staff and the single point of access service (SPOA). Progression of this protocol through the Health Board ratification process is being led by the MH&LD Deputy Director of Nursing and progress is overseen by the MH&LD Policy and Procedure Group. The revised protocol”
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
No specific action could be extracted with a verified quote.
- Each report's concerns were extracted by Nemotron 3 Nano on Nebius Token Factory, each with a quote copied from the report.
- Concerns from reports to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board at least six months apart were compared by meaning (Qwen3 embeddings) and wording (TF-IDF).
- The closest pairs were judged by Nemotron 3 Super with reasoning on. Only identical or closely related, with confidence of at least 0.70, are shown.
- Every quote was checked by code as an exact substring of the original text. Names of staff and family are redacted, and the deceased are named by report title only.
| Link | Meaning | Wording | Judge | Coroner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 → 2025 | 0.75 | 0.16 | Closely related · 0.90 | different |
Judge model: nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b. How Nemotron did the work · Full methodology.
Next
Other chains for Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.