Skip to content
recurance

Ambulance delays leading to resource unavailability

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate12 reports · 2014–2023No published response to an earlier report One-page brief (print or PDF)

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board received 12 coroners' reports about this hazard between 21 Jan 2014 and 10 Jul 2023.

They came from 4 different coroners in 4 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 11 times after the first warning.

A published response was found for 5 of the 11 earlier reports, stating 4 specific actions.

12
reports
4
different coroners
2014–2023
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Frederick Pring↗

    21 Jan 2014 · John Gittins · North Wales (East & Central)

    “the current practices in place for the handover of patients at an Emergency Department far too often results in wholly unacceptable delays with patients being kept waiting for long periods in ambulances and ambulance resources consequently being unavailable for allocation to other calls”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “incidents. WAST will review the Welsh MPDS codes and accompanying response recommendations (known as the 'DCR' table), with the intention of broadening the current response categories listed above to further distinguish between higher and lower acuity calls”

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

  2. 2 years 7 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Pamela Conway↗

    26 Aug 2016 · John Gittins · North Wales (East and Central)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
    “there remain wholly unacceptable delays with patients being kept waiting for long periods in ambulances and ambulance resources consequently being unavailable for allocation to other calls as a result of which the risk of future deaths continues”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:whollyunacceptabledelayspatientskeptwaiting

    Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “has considered your concems in relation to the following issues outlined in the two notifications: Flyst Regulation 28 Notification Part 1 ~ That not withstanding changes which have been made by both BGUHB and WAST, there remain wholly unacceptable delays with patients belng kept waliing for long periods in ambularices and ambulance resources consequences being unavailable for allocation te other calls as a result of which the risk of future”

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    Betsi Cadwaladr health board declares critical incident ↗
  3. 9 months later

    Raised again · 2nd time

    Lilly Baxandall↗

    17 May 2017 · John Gittins · North Wales (East and Central)

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high
    “unacceptable delays with patients being kept waiting for long periods in ambulances and ambulance resources consequently being unavailable for allocation to other calls”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:unacceptabledelayspatientskeptwaitinglong

    Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “In October 2015 WAST introduced a new clinical response model to implement new ways in which callers to 999 are assessed. This sought to ensure that patients and users of the service received the most appropriate care and a response to suit their individual needs. The changes made clearly identify those patients who require an immediate life-saving response and these patients receive the highest priority response in the fastest possible time. foe) All other patients receive a bespoke”

    Stated timescale: October 2015

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    Arrangements for Managing Demand – Betsi Cadwaladr ... ↗
  4. 0 months later

    Raised again · 3rd time

    Daphne Williams↗

    25 May 2017 · John Gittins · North Wales (East and Central)

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
    “The issues of ambulance delays/admission to ED/availability of resources/patient flow”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “In October 2015 WAST introduced a new clinical response model to implement new ways in which callers to 999 are assessed. This sought to ensure that patients and users of the service received the most appropriate care and a response to suit their individual needs.”

    Stated timescale: October 2015

    Web search (Tavily): No evidence found either way

    Have you had your say yet? We are now at the end of the fifth ... ↗
  5. 1 month later

    Raised again · 4th time

    Catherine Roberts↗

    7 Jul 2017 · Nicola Jones · North Wales (East and Central)

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “The issues of admission to the Emergency Department/availability of resources/patient flow and the multifactorial problems associated with cases of this nature have been reported upon by the Senior Coroner on several occasions following previous inquests”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    No published response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board was found for this report.

  6. 1 year 2 months later

    Raised again · 5th time

    Gladys Williams↗

    10 Sept 2018 · John Gittins · North Wales (East and Central)

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.96 · high
    “The issues of ambulance delays/admission to ED/availability of resources/patient flow and the multifactorial problems associated with cases of this nature have been reported upon by me on numerous occasions following previous inquests.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:issuesambulancedelaysadmissionEDavailabilityresourcespatientflow

    No published response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board was found for this report.

  7. 5 months later

    Raised again · 6th time

    Madeline Staples↗

    11 Feb 2019 · John Gittins · North Wales (East and Central)

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.98 · high
    “unacceptable delays with patients being kept waiting for long periods in ambulances and ambulance resources consequently being unavailable for allocation to other calls”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:unacceptabledelayspatientskeptwaitinglong

    No published response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board was found for this report.

  8. 9 months later

    Raised again · 7th time

    Peter Connelly↗

    7 Nov 2019 · John Gittins · North Wales (East and Central)

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.96 · high
    “unacceptable delays with patients being kept waiting for long periods in ambulances and ambulance resources consequently being unavailable for allocation to other calls”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:unacceptabledelayspatientskeptwaitinglong

    No published response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board was found for this report.

  9. 3 years 3 months later

    Raised again · 8th time

    David Strachan↗

    20 Feb 2023 · Kate Sutherland · North Wales (East and Central)

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “he causes of the ambulance delay were that all available resources were managing incidents of a higher acuity or the same category but registered prior and there were significant handover delays across all BCUHB sites.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:ambulanceresourcesdelays

    Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board responded.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

  10. 4 months later

    Raised again · 9th time

    Leonard Harmsworth↗

    20 Jun 2023 · Kate Sutherland · North Wales East and Central

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “Following the fall at home on 7th June 2022 WAST were contacted at 05:23. An ambulance arrived 17 hours 22 minutes later. On arrival at Ysbyty Glan Clwyd [the deceased] then waited in the ambulance for 12 hours 4 minutes before being handed over to nursing staff.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:WASTambulance

    No published response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board was found for this report.

  11. 0 months later

    Raised again · 10th time

    Jean Frickel↗

    21 Jun 2023 · Kate Sutherland · North Wales East and Central

    Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “It seems that patient flow i.e. those patients who are ready to be discharged from hospital but are unable to be discharged due to insufficiencies in social care means that ambulances are unable to offload patients into the Emergency Department”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:patientsambulances

    No published response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board was found for this report.

  12. 1 month later

    Raised again · 11th time

    Mary Jones↗

    10 Jul 2023 · Kate Robertson · North West Wales

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · higha different coroner
    “unacceptably lengthy delays remain such as in the case of [the deceased]”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  13. All reports to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error