Skip to content
recurance

Staff unawareness of observation requirements

Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · high2 reports · 2015–2022 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 24 Dec 2015 and 22 Aug 2022.

They came from 2 different coroners. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 3 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2015–2022
years
0.92
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Christopher Higgins↗

    24 Dec 2015 · Jacqueline Lake · Norfolk

    “It became clear during evidence, that members of staff are not aware of what is required of them when they carry out Observations on a patient.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 2 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗

    “the ' Trust has decided to fully enclose the ramp. This work has commenced and is proposed to be completed by the end of March 2016”

    Stated timescale: end of March 2016

    “The Trust is taking this matter further than the Norfolk acute hospitals instructing. managers based in Suffolk to liaise with their acute hospital colleagues as well, Each area is working to create local protocols which will be incorporated into policy.”
  2. 6 years 8 months later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Eliot Harris↗

    22 Aug 2022 · Jaqueline Lake · Norfolk

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.92 · higha different coroner
    “Substantial evidence was heard at the inquest with regard to observations which were not carried out in respect of [the deceased] in accordance with NSFT's Policy and with regard to staff not undergoing training and assessment of their competency to carry out observations correctly.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:evidenceobservationsstaffcarry

    Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “The ward has improved their processes which now ensures the nurse in charge is identified and roles allocated to the shift team members. To achieve this, the daily allocation form has been reviewed which clearly identifies the nurse in charge. In addition, the Matron oversees the off duty rota and delegates nurse- in-charge duties each shift. This is monitored by the Clinical Team Leader and Modern Matron. [name redacted] to this aspect the trust is formulating a seminar on shift co-ordination and”

    Stated timescale: three months

  3. All reports to Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error