Skip to content
recurance

Recurring hazard (see the quoted concerns)

Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high2 reports · 2024–2025 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Cornwall Council received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 14 May 2024 and 29 May 2025.

They came from 1 coroner in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 2 specific actions.

2
reports
1
coroner
2024–2025
years
0.85
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Sally Poynton↗

    14 May 2024 · Andrew Cox · Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly

    “A failure to advise [the deceased], as Nearest Relative, of her statutory right to request [REDACTED] assessment under the MHA.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Cornwall Council responded, stating 2 specific actions.Response (PDF) ↗Response (PDF) ↗

    “The ICB has taken this matter seriously and the executive leadership of the ICB were presented with a paper in a formal executive group meeting. The paper provided an analysis of this issue and a proposal for how it should be addressed. The meeting took place on the 8 July 2024 and supported the proposal; which is described in this letter.”

    Stated timescale: 8 July 2024

    “We are continuing to work with colleagues through the Domestic Homicide Review process to identify actions stemming from the Senior Coroner's proposed recommendations.”

    Stated timescale: next 6 months

  2. 1 year later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Callum Hargreaves (5)↗

    29 May 2025 · Andrew Cox · Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high
    “The Nearest Relative details on the MH 1 form were not completed.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Repeated from the earlier report:NearestRelative

    Cornwall Council responded.Response (PDF) ↗

  3. All reports to Cornwall Council

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error