← Back to the chain

Recurance · prevention of future deaths reports

Pre-inquest brief

Recurring hazard (see the quoted concerns)

Organisation: Cornwall Council · Generated: 27 Oct 2026

Recurance · recurance.com/chains/362b32e9e5ae8bd4

The earlier warning

Sally Poynton · 14 May 2024 · Andrew Cox, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly

“A failure to advise [the deceased], as Nearest Relative, of her statutory right to request [REDACTED] assessment under the MHA.”

judiciary.uk/…/sally-poynton-prevention-of-future-deaths-report

What was promised

Stated action 1 · response to Sally Poynton (14 May 2024) · stated timescale: 8 July 2024

“The ICB has taken this matter seriously and the executive leadership of the ICB were presented with a paper in a formal executive group meeting. The paper provided an analysis of this issue and a proposal for how it should be addressed. The meeting took place on the 8 July 2024 and supported the proposal; which is described in this letter.”

judiciary.uk/…/2024-0267-Response-Integrated-Care-Board-Office-…

Stated action 2 · response to Sally Poynton (14 May 2024) · stated timescale: next 6 months

“We are continuing to work with colleagues through the Domestic Homicide Review process to identify actions stemming from the Senior Coroner's proposed recommendations.”

judiciary.uk/…/2024-0267-Cornwall-Council.pdf

What recurred

  • 29 May 2025 · Callum Hargreaves (5) · Andrew Cox · Closely related · confidence 0.85 (high)

The clearest link, quoted from both reports:

Earlier · Sally Poynton · 14 May 2024

“A failure to advise [the deceased], as Nearest Relative, of her statutory right to request [REDACTED] assessment under the MHA.”

Later · Callum Hargreaves (5) · 29 May 2025

“The Nearest Relative details on the MH 1 form were not completed.”

What happened next

No web check of the stated actions has been published for this chain.

Every quote is verified word for word against the original report on judiciary.uk. A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, Open Government Licence v3.0.