Skip to content
recurance

Absence of cardiotocography monitoring in maternity settings

Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate2 reports · 2017–2021 One-page brief (print or PDF)

Department of Health and Social Care received 2 coroners' reports about this hazard between 27 Nov 2017 and 31 Dec 2021.

They came from 2 different coroners in 2 coroner areas. A similar concern was raised again 1 time after the first warning.

A published response was found for 1 of the 1 earlier reports, stating 2 specific actions.

2
reports
2
different coroners
2017–2021
years
0.80
lowest link confidence

The story, report by report

Spacing grows with the time between reports.

  1. First warning

    Rafe Angelo↗

    27 Nov 2017 · Karen Harold · Portsmouth & South East Hampshire

    “CTG is not currently available in birthing centres and should be considered in emergency situations such as this case especially if it is not possible to transport the mother to hospital.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Department of Health and Social Care responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “the HSIB will investigate around 1,000 cases a year with the expectation that the learning from investigations will spur system improvements leading to fewer deaths and injuries in the future.”

    Stated timescale: April 2019

  2. 4 years 1 month later

    Raised again · 1st time

    Jos Tartese-Joy↗

    31 Dec 2021 · Alison Mutch · Greater Manchester South

    Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderatea different coroner
    “During the inquest it was accepted that CTG monitoring should have | taken place at admission given that the pregnancy had been identified as high risk.”
    Original on judiciary.uk ↗

    Department of Health and Social Care responded, stating 1 specific action.Response (PDF) ↗

    “I note that it was found that there was no nationally recognised way of flagging in maternity notes that a pregnancy is considered high-risk. As a consequence, the community midwife and GP were not aware that the pregnancy was high-risk, and additionally the mother herself was not explicitly counselled about this.”

    Stated timescale: 2023/24

  3. All reports to Department of Health and Social Care

Next

This shows that a similar concern was raised again after an earlier report. It does not say why, and it is not a finding about any organisation or person. To report an error, see the corrections route.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error