Skip to content
recurance

Wayne Millett

18 Feb 2020 · Coroner Christopher Morris · Manchester South

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of critical analysis of care and treatment

    “The Priory's own investigation into the circumstances of Mr [name redacted] death was notably lacking in meaningful critical analysis of the care and treatment he received, and in particular was fundamentally flawed in that it failed to consider the care given as against the Care Plan despite its obvious central relevance to his death.”
  2. 2. lack of audit of compliance with care plans

    “3) The court heard differing evidence from staff working at The Priory Hospital, Cheadle and from the Peripatetic Director of Clinical Services as to what the organisation's expectations were in respect of care plans, and specifically the degree of adherence which were required to them. In the light of this significant divergence of opinion, it is a matter of concern that the Priory Group has not undertaken any audit of compliance with care plans (either at The Priory Hospital, Cheadle or”
  3. 3. lack of formal review of Clozapine care plans

    “Itis a matter of concern that, notwithstanding the cause of death identified on Post Mortem Examination and despite nearly a year having passed since Mr [name redacted] death, the organisation has yet to formally review the care plans of all patients prescribed Clozapine, with a view to ensuring each relevant patient has in place a clear plan for monitoring of potential side-effects of the medication, which gives clear and authoritative direction to staff as to how to act if serious complications are”

Linked reports

Raised again laterDavid Thompson12 Aug 2024 · 4 years 6 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“The court heard differing evidence from staff working at The Priory Hospital, Cheadle and from the Peripatetic Director of Clinical Services as to what the organisation's expectations were in respect of care plans, and specifically the degree of adherence which were required to them.”

Later report

“There was no evidence that the four standard care plans had been opened during Mr [name redacted] inpatient stay.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Lack of audit and standard care plan implementation

Responses

2020-0031-Response-from-Priory_Redacted.pdf ↗· The Priory Group

Stated action

“The SUI report and report convey that overall, the care and treatment provided by staff to Mr [name redacted], a long-term patient who had been at the hospital since November 2013 was of an acceptable standard.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error