Skip to content
recurance

Tamara Davis

15 Oct 2024 · Coroner Joanne Andrews · West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 2 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. patients treated in ED corridor

    “when the Emergency Department of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton reached capacity patients would be moved to and treated in the corridor as there was no clinical area available to do so”
  2. 2. use of ED corridors for patient care

    “use of corridors to care for patients is not only an issue at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton but is used throughout the country when the capacities of Emergency Departments has been reached and there is nowhere to move patients to”
  3. 3. lack of privacy and confidentiality for patients

    “patients lacked privacy, toilet facilities and confidentiality”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningSamuel Garner27 Jul 2020 · 4 years 3 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“As a result of the lack of appropriate space Mr [name redacted] an elderly and vulnerable patient was treated in the corridor for periods during his stay in the ED.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“when the Emergency Department of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton reached capacity patients would be moved to and treated in the corridor as there was no clinical area available to do so”
Full chain: Corridor patient care due to insufficient space
Raised again laterMaureen Batchelor5 Aug 2025 · 10 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.96 · high

This report

“privacy, toilet facilities and confidentiality. I understood from the evidence of the clinicians that they were concerned that patients were being moved into the Corridor but there appeared to be no other option when the Emergency Department exceeds capacity.”

Later report

“During the inquest I heard evidence from clinicians at University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust that when the Emergency Department of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton reached capacity patients would be moved to and treated in the corridor as there was no clinical area available to do so.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Use of corridors for patient care during ED overcrowding
Raised again laterDavid Smart22 May 2026 · 1 year 7 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

This report

“when the Emergency Department of the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton reached capacity patients would be moved to and treated in the corridor as there was no clinical area available to do so”

Later report

“there were around 20 patients in the corridor as the Department had reached capacity and there was no clinical area available to do so”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Patients treated in ED corridor due to lack of clinical space

Responses

2024-0553-Response-from-DHSC.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

Stated action

“The report raises concerns over emergency department capacity, poor patient flow and the use of corridor care at Royal Sussex County Hospital (RSCH) and nationally. I understand that your report and matters of concerns have also been sent to NHS England, and they are best placed to respond with the specific actions being taken locally to improve urgent and emergency care performance at RSCH.”

2024-0553-Response-from-NHS-England.pdf ↗· NHS England

Stated action

“NHS England is working through the operating model so that NHS England's Regions can support providers to eliminate crowding in Emergency Departments in the longer term.”

2024-0553-Response-from-University-Hospitals-Sussex.pdf ↗· University Sussex NHS Foundation Trust

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error