Sobhia Khan
The coroner's concerns
1. discharge of s.41 restricted patients without tribunal scrutiny
“Scrutiny of s.41 MHA 1983 cases by the Mental Health Tribunal. In this case [REDACTED] was discharged by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) following the receipt of reports from Cygnet Hospital which were inadequate and misrepresented the progress he had made and the risk that he posed. Nonetheless there were indicators which should have led the MoJ to question whether this case should have been referred to a Mental Health Tribunal, such as [REDACTED] minimising his culpability for his previous off”
2. lack of forensic supervision pathway for s.41 patients
“Ensuring that s.41 restricted patients are supervised under a forensic pathway. In this case no such pathway even existed in the locality. This meant that [name redacted]'s supervision was inadequate having regard to the risk that he posed. Such orders are imposed to protect the public from the risk of serious harm.”
3. police inability to arrest high‑risk individuals concealing relationships
“Police power to arrest where there is a reason to believe a person is at risk of death/serious injury. Whilst I was critical of the failure of the police to take measures that were reasonably available to them to investigate the intelligence that had been received that [REDACTED] was in a relationship, the one power that was not available to them was to arrest him.”
4. inadequate recall mechanism for high‑risk s.41 patients
“Ministry of Justice power to recall where a patient poses a significant risk to the public. The MoJ will not generally recall dangerous individuals unless there is a decline in their mental health presentation notwithstanding the fact that s.41 MHA 1983, to which [REDACTED] was subject, is designed to protect the public from serious harm.”
5. unmonitored travel of s.41 patients abroad
“Travel overseas for s.41 restricted patients. [REDACTED]was permitted to travel to and from Pakistan freely and to return seemingly as and when he saw fit. Whilst he was outside the jurisdiction there was no way of checking on him, including in terms of his mental health, but also his risk.”
6. insufficient risk assessment information for discharge decisions
“Clinicians should be provided with full reports when considering discharge. This was a particular concern in relation to the fact that those recommending discharge were not provided with the full Spousal Assault Risk Assessment, but only a summary.”
Responses
2024-0088-Response-from-Cygnet.pdf ↗· Cygnet Health Care
Stated action · 22 March 2024
“PFD action plan was reviewed at Clinical Governance meetings on 22 March 2024. It is listed to be an agenda item every month until September 2024 and provided that all actions are embedded at that point, it will be closed.”
Stated action
“The action plan has been shared with the Senior Management Team for, and the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) and all staff involved in Mr [name redacted] care at, Cygnet Hospital Derby.”
Stated action · bi-monthly
“The action plan is included in Cygnet Derby Overarching Local Action Plan (OLAP) and reviewed bi-monthly by the General Manager, Hospital Manager, and Clinical Manager to ensure completion and embedding of the actions.”
Stated action · 8 March 2024
“The action plan was discussed and agreed at Medical Advisory Committee (MAC) (8 March 2024).”
Stated action · 23 May 2024
“The action plan will also be disseminated to NHS IMPACT Contract meeting for Commissioner scrutiny and openness of process (23 May 2024).”
Stated action · 31 May 2024
“The manipulation measurement tool, currently used for females, to be added as an addendum to the HCR-20 (a Secure Services Standard Risk Assessment tool for baseline risk assessment) and used for males going forward.”
2024-0088-Response-from-Derby-City-Council.pdf ↗· Derby City Council
2024-0088-Response-from-Derbyshire-Constabulary.pdf ↗· Derbyshire Constabulary
2024-0088-Response-from-Derbyshire-Healthcare-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf ↗· Derbyshire NHS Foundation Trust
2024-0088-Response-from-Ministry-of-Justice.pdf ↗· Ministry of Justice