Skip to content
recurance

Sidney Baker

2 Dec 2019 · Coroner Rachel Syed · Manchester (West)

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 3 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of contemporaneous referral documentation

    “There were no contemporaneous documents that a Dieticians or Falls Team referral had been made by the Care Home personnel in question”
  2. 2. incorrect care plan entries and poor record keeping

    “There were concerns that entries contained in Mr [name redacted] care plan were incorrect, including vital information contained on his weight monitoring sheet. Furthermore, the general quality of record keeping was poor.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningRonald Farrington22 Dec 2017 · 1 year 11 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

Earlier report

“Failed to keep accurate records.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Furthermore, the general quality of record keeping was poor.”
Full chain: Inaccurate and inconsistent care plan entries and record keeping
Raised again laterJohn Dickinson22 Jul 2021 · 1 year 8 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“There were concerns that entries contained in Mr [name redacted] care plan were incorrect, including vital information contained on his weight monitoring sheet. Furthermore, the general quality of record keeping was poor.”

Later report

“The record keeping was inconsistent and lacked detail on general wellbeing.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inaccurate and inconsistent care plan entries and record keeping
Raised again laterRonald Nelson15 Jan 2026 · 6 years 1 month later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“There were concerns that entries contained in Mr [name redacted] care plan were incorrect, including vital information contained on his weight monitoring sheet. Furthermore, the general quality of record keeping was poor.”

Later report

“That there remain potential issues of poor record keeping.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inaccurate and inconsistent care plan entries and record keeping
Raised again laterSusan Dale26 Jun 2026 · 6 years 7 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

This report

“There were concerns that entries contained in Mr [name redacted] care plan were incorrect, including vital information contained on his weight monitoring sheet. Furthermore, the general quality of record keeping was poor.”

Later report

“(1) The record keeping in the home appeasers to be inaccurate and inconsistent”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inaccurate and inconsistent care plan entries and record keeping

Responses

2019-0407-Response-by-CQC.pdf ↗· Care Quality Commission

Stated action · 12 months

“We will carry out a further comprehensive inspection within 12 months, to ensure action has been taken and the provider is no longer in breach.”

2019-0407-Response-by-Rosewood.pdf ↗· Rosewood Healthcare Group

2019-0407-Response-by-Wigan-Council.pdf ↗· Care Quality Commission

Stated action · 24th June 2019 to present

“Council's considerations and investigation: Following Mr [name redacted] death, several monitoring and support visits took place at Barely Brook. We considered a sample of referrals that had been made in respect of current residents. Wigan Council can confirm that the recording of referrals of any kind (including dietician and falls team, and referrals to the Later Life and Memory Team) has improved. Barley Brook has demonstrated they are now keeping contemporaneous records and documentation.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error