Skip to content
recurance

Selina Broadhurst

17 Feb 2014 · Coroner John Pollard · Manchester (South)

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. missed or delayed diagnosis of severe brain injury

    “the NICE Guidelines do not indicate as being appropriate where there are no obvious neurological signs”

Linked reports

Raised again laterKaren O'Brien15 Jul 2015 · 1 year 5 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“The Emergency Department doctors indicated that they could not get a CT of the head because "the NICE Guidelines do not indicate as being appropriate where there are no obvious neurological signs".”

Later report

“The NICE guidance is stated to be a recommendation. It must therefore be presumed not to be applied slavishly without careful assessment.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Missed or delayed diagnosis of severe brain injury

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error