Skip to content
recurance

Satheeskumar Mahatheaven

19 Sept 2014 · Coroner ME Hassell · London Inner (North)

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. information sharing failures

    “Failures in relation to information sharing, multi agency communication procedures and inadequate training for staff at the prison services have contributed to this accident.”
  2. 2. inadequate staff training

    “inadequate training for staff at the prison services”
  3. 3. multi agency communication breakdown

    “multi agency communication procedures”

Linked reports

Raised again laterJohn Williams28 Mar 2017 · 2 years 6 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“inadequate training for staff at the prison services have contributed to this accident.”

Later report

“Some prison officers did not seem familiar with the very important contents of the ACCT, not even the inside cover.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate staff training and understanding of ACCT protocol

Responses

2014-0412-Response-by-NOMS.pdf ↗· HMP Pentonville

Stated action

“Local policies are now in place at HMP Pentonville and HMP Thameside to ensure that information is shared appropriately and that there is effective communication between prison staff and the healthcare provider.”

Mahathevan-2014-0412a.pdf ↗· HMP Pentonville

Stated action · 28 November 2014

“Action should therefore be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe that you have the power to take such action.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error