Skip to content
recurance

Richard Walsh

25 Oct 2016 · Coroner Andrew Harris · London Inner (South)

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. future deaths

    “there is still a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken”
  2. 2. defect in communications system

    “The expert psychiatrist gave an opinion that there was a defect in the system of communications between professionals and agencies involved in the care of Mr [name redacted]”
  3. 3. inadequate information transfer of DPMFs and MHA assessments

    “Custody Advisor informs the court that the national system was that the Detained Person's Medical Forms (DPMFs) were routinely scanned onto the police RMS system, but the Mental Health Act Assessment is not”
  4. 4. lack of communication of MHA assessment

    “No report or letter or appropriate communication about the MHA assessment was completed in the police station to subsequent health care providers”
  5. 5. misleading risk assessment

    “The Pre-Release risk assessment was completed by a custody officer, indicating that the deceased had no risks”
  6. 6. incomplete PER documentation

    “The PER completed at HMP Highdown did not even reflect the limited information they had received from the police station three days earlier”

Linked reports

Raised again laterJonathan Thornton8 Apr 2026 · 9 years 5 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“There appeared to be not only serious failures of communication, but failures from inadequate processes of communication between custodial and health professionals, between police, court, health care and prison services”

Later report

“I am concerned that the lack of formal information sharing between the two departments gives rise to a risk of future death. Information sharing between Prison Healthcare and Operational Prison Staff.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Lack of communication between prison healthcare and operational staff

Responses

2016-0377-Response-by-Department-of-Health.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

Stated action

“You asked that the inquest findings be brought to the attention of those who lead the 'Departmental training programme' for Approved Mental Healthcare Practitioners (AMHPs) and consideration be given as to whether further guidance or training regarding Mental Health Act Assessments is required.”

2016-0377-Response-by-Health-Care-Professions-Council.pdf ↗· Hampshire County Council

Stated action · 2018

“We will ensure that the new regulator is aware of this report and our correspondence.”

2016-0377-Response-by-Virgin-Care-Limited.pdf ↗· Hampshire County Council

Stated action · 19/12/2016

“We attach as Appendix A a copy of the”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error