Skip to content
recurance

Rhianne Barton

1 Jun 2016 · Coroner Karen Henderson · Surrey

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of obstetric consultant supervision

    “[the deceased]'s named obstetric consultant was not informed of her emergency admission”
  2. 2. failure to exclude surgical cause

    “No consideration was given to excluding a surgical cause of [the deceased]'s symptoms despite the history of sudden onset of upper abdominal pain in the knowledge that she had had bariatric surgery”
  3. 3. delayed investigations

    “there was still a responsibility to exclude other causes of abdominal pain in the absence of an obstetric cause, by undertaking appropriate investigations in a timely fashion”
  4. 4. inadequate documentation

    “poor documentation of routine observations and an incomplete fluid balance chart”
  5. 5. lack of obstetric care plan

    “The obstetric consultant made no specific plans with regard to the obstetric care that [the deceased] would receive during pregnancy and labour despite knowing that she had undergone bariatric surgery”
  6. 6. guidance gap

    “Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology had not specifically addressed this issue in their guidance to practicing clinicians”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error