Skip to content
recurance

Reginald Cauthery

4 Oct 2022 · Coroner Sarah Bourke · Inner North London

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of telecare service review

    “There was no review of the telecare service provided to Mr [name redacted] despite the agencies working with him being aware of his increased fire risk and deteriorating mobility.”
  2. 2. delayed emergency response due to disconnected smoke alarm

    “The ability of frail and vulnerable people to get urgent help in a fire situation will often depend upon other people recognising that a smoke alarm has triggered and calling the Fire Brigade. This raises particular problems if the person lives alone and their smoke alarm is not connected to their telecare system.”
  3. 3. delayed 999 call due to manual alarm verification

    “If Mr [name redacted] smoke alarm had been connected to his telecare system, the call would have been answered as a priority. In addition, the call handler would not have spent several minutes seeking confirmation that the smoke alarm was going off before making a 999 call.”

Responses

2022-0326-Response-from-Lodon-Borough-of-Hackney.pdf ↗· Home Office

Stated action · 2nd February, 2023

“The Council attaches a table in which it sets out, by column, its identification of what could be done better, learning from the circumstances of Mr [name redacted] death, the action it intends to take and the time-frame for that action.”

2022-0326-Response-from-TEC-Services-Association.pdf ↗· Telecare Services Association

Stated action

“they have since written to LBH, to offer their Occupational Therapy services to conduct reassessments of the TEC customers, if LBH is unable to conduct them.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error