Skip to content
recurance

Rachel Edwards

27 Feb 2017 · Coroner Nigel Parsley · Suffolk

A similar concern from this report was raised again 2 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. stockpiling of medication leading to overdose

    “Prior to [the deceased]'s death, on the 6th March 2017 she was informally admitted to the Woodlands mental health ward In Ipswich following a significant overdose she had taken on the 3rd March 2017”
  2. 2. inadequate medication disposal

    “It was known that [the deceased] was at risk of stockpiling medication as in the Serious Incident Requiring Investigation (SIRI) report it is noted that a request made on the 7th March 2017 by her treating doctor, for the disposal of her stocks of medication had not been actioned”
  3. 3. inconsistent medication quantity documentation

    “Such confusion over the actual quantities of medication Issued and the apparent issuing of 14 days supply of medicines to a patient who is known to have previously stockpiled medication, with a View to self-harm, is of obvious concern”
  4. 4. lack of automated discharge medication notification

    “there is no automated notification to a patient's GP of the type and amounts of prescription medicines issued to a patient upon discharge from Woodlands”
  5. 5. absence of patient advocacy system

    “no 'patient advocate' or other similar service in place to act as filter and alert those providing support to prepare for the increased feeling of hopelessness that would clearly follow such news”
  6. 6. lack of formal patient advocate appointment process

    “no formal system in place for an advocate to be appointed in other cases when it could prove beneficial”

Linked reports

Raised again laterEllie Long18 Mar 2019 · 2 years 1 month later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

This report

“there is no automated notification to a patient's GP of the type and amounts of prescription medicines issued to a patient upon discharge from Woodlands”

Later report

“An initial full, updating letter was sent to [the deceased]'s GP. However no further updating information was sent.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Lack of automated discharge medication notification to GP
Raised again laterLewis Begley26 Sept 2022 · 5 years 7 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“Such confusion over the actual quantities of medication Issued and the apparent issuing of 14 days supply of medicines to a patient who is known to have previously stockpiled medication, with a View to self-harm, is of obvious concern.”

Later report

“Evidence was heard that medication is kept in a locked room and in locked cabinets, in accordance with legislation. However, there is no record kept as to what medication is stored and how much”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inconsistent medication quantity documentation and unrecorded stock

Responses

2024-0220-Response-from-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf ↗· Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust

Stated action

“The Trust will make an assessment of the medications prescribed upon discharge and this consideration will continue across the Trust.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error