Skip to content
recurance

Philip Quelch

7 Jul 2026 · Coroner Sally Robinson · Essex

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inconsistent supervision during meals

    “Mr [name redacted] was not consistently supervised whilst he was eating his meals”
  2. 2. lack of Best Interests Assessor involvement

    “Mr [name redacted] was subject to a DOLS. It was not clear at inquest what involvement there had been with the Best Interests Assessor”
  3. 3. missing choking risk assessment and capacity assessment

    “If a Best Interests Assessor notes an adult is at risk of choking, then they should check a choking risk assessment has been carried out and there should be an assessment of capacity under the Mental Health Capacity Act”
  4. 4. inadequate nutrition support guidance

    “If these have not been done, then The Best Interests Assessor should consider a recommendation under the DOLS that the adult should receive appropriate guidance and support when accessing nutrition”
  5. 5. premature closure of SALT referral

    “The SALT referral was closed despite Mr [name redacted] having a co morbidities which were degenerative in nature and likely to lead to SALT issues in the future”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error