Skip to content
recurance

Olive Nugent

31 Mar 2015 · Coroner Karen Dilks · Newcastle Upon Tyne

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. critical injury without assistance

    “Mrs [name redacted] lay critically injured in her home for 2 hours and 27 minutes without assistance or access to medical treatment”
  2. 2. device activation

    “Her falls activator device had activated automatically indicating that she had fallen”
  3. 3. inability to verbally respond

    “Her inability to respond verbally to call handlers via the device was a crucial factor in the decision not to prioritise her case”
  4. 4. subjective prioritisation

    “The prioritising of response to device activation is entirely subjective and heavily dependent upon (a) staffing levels and (b) the personal practices of individual team leaders”
  5. 5. insufficient staff

    “On 16 December 2014 there were insufficient staff to meet the demand for assistance”
  6. 6. future deaths

    “Further deaths could potentially occur in the future; particularly in cases of persons injured and unable to respond verbally to call handlers”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Olive Nugent · Recurance