Skip to content
recurance

Natasha Hill

1 May 2026 · Coroner Julian Morris · Inner South London

This report repeats 1 earlier warning. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of formal review of teenagers approaching 18 by adult safeguarding team and independent reviewing officer

    “Anyone requiring/ needing/suffering o Safeguarding o Domestic violence o Controlling/ coercive behaviour”
  2. 2. absence of dedicated young person's safeguarding team

    “Thought should be given to creating a young person's team covering the transition from under 18 (MACE) to adult safeguarding teams e.g. For the period 18-22”
  3. 3. no extension of CAWN for young persons at risk

    “Thought should be given to the creation of a young person's protection by way of creation of an extension to the CAWN for the young person, against the adult creating that safeguarding risk e.g. young person's abuse warning notice”
  4. 4. fragmented national policy on child sexual exploitation

    “The creation of one single national policy for policing and child sexual exploitation following the groundwork laid down by Operation Hydrant and local Forces”
  5. 5. inconsistent offender management and guidance

    “Re safeguarding offender management, the use of VOO's and the creation of POETs/ DAPST and RMUs: Consideration should be given to the creation of one set of criteria with one name whose role it is to cover and create a central guidance”
  6. 6. limited national dissemination of local protocols

    “To consider the wider dissemination of existing local protocols nationally, for example the London Exploitation Protocol”
  7. 7. inadequate guidance for missing persons and return interviews

    “The provision of guidance in respect of missing persons/ runaways and the return to home interviews to assist the actions of the police and local councils”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningDane Pearson14 Jan 2019 · 7 years 4 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.70 · moderate

Earlier report

“In issuing, the CAWN there was no evidence that his known vulnerability had been taken into account. A risk assessment had not been carried out.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Thought should be given to the creation of a young person's protection by way of creation of an extension to the CAWN for the young person, against the adult creating that safeguarding risk e.g. young person's abuse warning notice.”
Full chain: Inadequate CAWN risk assessment for young persons

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error