Skip to content
recurance

Kim Robinson

31 Jan 2025 · Coroner Nigel Parsley · Suffolk

This report repeats 1 earlier warning. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. unauthorized access to patient records

    “The need for online prescribers to be able to access a patient's records (at least the Summary Care Records). These records could be attached to the consultation for review by the prescriber.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningAnia Sohail7 Feb 2023 · 2 years earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“There is no requirement for the on-line pharmacies to share information with the patient's GP. This means that, in the absence of the patient's consent to share information, the online prescriber is reliant on the accuracy and truthfulness of the history provided by the patient.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“The need for online prescribers to be able to access a patient's records (at least the Summary Care Records). These records could be attached to the consultation for review by the prescriber.”
Full chain: Lack of information sharing between online prescribing services and GP systems

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error