Kathleen Allen
4 Jul 2018 · Coroner Emma Brown · Birmingham and Solihull
The coroner's concerns
1. inconsistent MEWS escalation pathway
“The Mews Chart contained within Mrs [name redacted] A and E records was the Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust 'Adult MEWS Observation Chart'. The Escalation Pathway was clearly set out providing that for a MEWs of between 1 and 3 there should be consideration of increasing frequency of observations and”
2. failure to alert Nurse in Charge about rising MEWS
“The evidence of the staff nurse caring for Mrs [name redacted] during the evening of the 18 March was that he did not alert the Nurse in Charge when Mrs [name redacted] MEWS went up to three (having gradually risen from 0 at the time of arrival) because A and E nurses had been told that this part of the escalation pathway did not apply in A and E”
3. inconsistent MEWS procedures across departments
“It therefore appears that there is not a consistent approach to MEWS SOP in Birmingham Heartlands ED: members of staff are being told different things and there appears to be a different procedure in operation to that set out in documents within patient records. There is a risk that staff within ED will not be taking a consistent, evidence based approach to MEWS and also that non ED based clinicians, reviewing patients in ED will not be aware of the difference in MEWS procedure operating in ED”
Responses
2018-0213-Response-by-University-Hospitals-Birmingham-NHS-Trust.pdf ↗· University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Stated action · now
“The Trust recognises the concerns with regards to the apparent inconsistent approach to the MEWS Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) in BHH ED and the lack of consideration given to increasing the frequency of patient observations and the lack of escalation to the Nurse in Charge as the clinical condition of the patient deteriorated.”