Skip to content
recurance

John Slope

7 May 2021 · Coroner Yvonne Blake · Norfolk

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. absence of documented salivary bypass tube

    “no method of noting in the medical records that a salivary bypass tube is in the patient's body”
  2. 2. lack of visual alert for bypass tube

    “no method of showing staff in the notes that a patient has this prosthesis and that no thought had been given to this simple measure e.g. a rubber stamp stating patient has a bypass tube in situ to be ticked and signed”
  3. 3. inadequate medical documentation

    “quality of the documentation pre and post operatively is of poor quality and would not assist other staff to find out what treatment had been given”
  4. 4. missing consent documentation for bypass tube

    “there is nowhere on the consent form or the anaesthetic checklist for the presence of a tube to be asked about and documented”
  5. 5. failure to escalate patient concerns

    “clinical specialist nurses did not contact anyone or document the concerns raised by Mr [name redacted] in March 2020”
  6. 6. lack of external treatment summary

    “hospital did not request a summary of Mr [name redacted] treatment at a different hospital before commencing the procedures”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error