Skip to content
recurance

John Adams

1 Jul 2014 · Coroner Veronica Hamilton-Deeley · Brighton & Hove

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. recruitment of patient before procedure

    “It seems that the Trial was in very early stages at the Brighton Hospital and that Mr. [name redacted] may have been the fourth patient to have been recruited”
  2. 2. inadequate consent process

    “Was it appropriate that he should have been recruited within an hour or so prior to his procedure commencing?”
  3. 3. lack of informed consent

    “Did this give him time to read the several page booklet which was provided to him and to absorb the information and give informed consent?”
  4. 4. inappropriate operator involvement

    “Is it appropriate for a visiting Cardiologist, only present at the Hospital for a few hours every fortnight to be the”
  5. 5. inadequate communication of trial details

    “Given that the Consultant [name redacted] in Mr. [name redacted]' case does only visit Brighton once a fortnight for a few hours, and this was his first patient on the Trial, was he himself appropriately informed?”
  6. 6. omission of critical complication details

    “The Hospital notes for Mr. [name redacted] admission on the 30”

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

John Adams · Recurance