Skip to content
recurance

Helen Kerr

18 Sept 2024 · Coroner Caroline Topping · Surrey

This report repeats 2 earlier warnings. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of timely mental health referrals

    “Cogent information about Ms [name redacted] declining mental health was provided repeatedly to Surrey and Borders Partnership secondary mental health teams from the refuge support workers. It was not explored with them, and insufficient weight was given to it during the triage process. Ms [name redacted] was not provided with appropriate and timely referrals for mental health treatment.”
  2. 2. inadequate out-of-hours information sharing

    “The SCARF process does not enable information sharing between the Police, Mental Health Agencies and Surrey Adult Safeguarding out of hours. It is under review. It remains unclear how information sharing out of hours is to be achieved in a timely fashion to safeguard individuals and the public.”
  3. 3. refuge staff unawareness of client's delusions

    “The refuge was not made aware of Ms [name redacted] presentation on the 31st March 2023 by Surrey Police. Her delusions about the actions of refuge workers could have put them in danger.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningWilliam Hafele24 Nov 2014 · 9 years 10 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“- In relation to the Police, specific training with regards to risk assessments for mental health patients was lacking”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“(1) Cogent information about Ms [name redacted] declining mental health was provided repeatedly to Surrey and Borders Partnership secondary mental health teams from the refuge support workers. It was not explored with them, and insufficient weight was given to”
Full chain: Lack of mental health risk assessment training and timely referrals
Repeats an earlier warningBarbara Woodman22 Dec 2023 · 9 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.95 · high

Earlier report

“The use of the SCARF process during out of hours to provide timely and effective passage of information in relation to concerns for vulnerable persons in the community.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“(3) The SCARF process does not enable information sharing between the Police, Mental Health Agencies and Surrey Adult Safeguarding out of hours.”
Full chain: Inadequate out-of-hours information sharing in SCARF process

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error