Skip to content
recurance

Geraldine Kilborn

10 Dec 2014 · Coroner Andrew Tweddle · County Durham & Darlington

A similar concern from this report was raised again 4 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of information sharing

    “There was a clear breakdown in sharing of information known to the mental health team with other members of some ACCT reviews”
  2. 2. inadequate review preparation

    “Witnesses confirmed that they often did not read much of the ACCT document prior to the ACCT review and relied more upon input of other attendees”
  3. 3. misleading assessment

    “some ACCT review members had limited day to day experience of the deceased, whose temperament and presentation could change "like a light switch”

Linked reports

Raised again laterWarren Sampson6 Sept 2016 · 1 year 9 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.70 · moderate

This report

“Witnesses confirmed that they often did not read much of the ACCT document prior to the ACCT review and relied more upon input of other attendees”

Later report

“The lack of written evidence within the ACCT documentation of contributory input from other agencies such as Healthcare.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate ACCT document review and agency input documentation
Raised again laterLiam Lambert20 Sept 2016 · 1 year 9 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“Witnesses confirmed that they often did not read much of the ACCT document prior to the ACCT review and relied more upon input of other attendees”

Later report

“Available documentary information was not read or used, and pressures of time were cited to explain these failings.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate ACCT training leading to incomplete documentation
Raised again laterJohn Williams28 Mar 2017 · 2 years 4 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“Witnesses confirmed that they often did not read much of the ACCT document prior to the ACCT review and relied more upon input of other attendees”

Later report

“Some prison officers did not seem familiar with the very important contents of the ACCT, not even the inside cover.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate ACCT document review and agency input documentation
Raised again laterMark Doyle18 Dec 2017 · 3 years later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“There was a clear breakdown in sharing of information known to the mental health team with other members of some ACCT reviews.”

Later report

“Although, , Head of Healthcare, described how healthcare staff have received recent encouragement to make entries on a prisoner's ACCT in relation to matters that could bear on risk, I am concerned that this does not go far enough to change past practice and ensure that relevant information is shared, in light of the prison staff's lack of access to System One records and the infrequent occasions that Care UK staff made entries on Mr [name redacted] ACCT daily record.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Lack of relevant information sharing during ACCT reviews

Responses

2014-0532-Response-by-Care-UK.pdf ↗· Care UK

Stated action · April 2015

“From April 2015 the health service delivery model will change from a Prime Provider model to a 7 Lot commissioning model .The National Health Service Commissioning Board has procured seven services - GP Services including Pharmacy, Dental, Optometry, Community Care, Non-Clinical Substance Misuse, Mental Health and Support Services.”

2014-0532-Response-by-NOMS.pdf ↗· Care UK

Stated action

“an amended arrangement has been put in place to facilitate the presence of a member of the mental health team at ACCT reviews that take place at the weekend”

2014-0532-Response-by-Tess-Esk-Wear-Valleys-NHS-Trust.pdf ↗· Tees Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error