Skip to content
recurance

George French-Russell

1 Mar 2018 · Coroner Alison Mutch · Manchester (South)

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of guidance for rapidly evolving labour

    “during the telephone conversation between EMAS and [the deceased]'s mother her labour was rapidly developing. There was no evidence of the call taker seeking guidance on how to deal with a rapidly evolving situation other than to update the ambulance crew who were on route.”
  2. 2. lack of structured information exchange

    “The way in which information was exchanged between Stepping Hill Hospital and EMAS meant that all those involved in making decisions were not in possession of key facts. There was no structure to how information was shared and it was passed 3 hand”
  3. 3. inexperienced paramedics handling footling breech delivery

    “During labour EMAS were present. The paramedics did not have the experience to deal with a footling breech delivery. Expert input was given for a brief period by a registrar but when that conversation terminated there was no further support given or sought”

Responses

2018-0062-Response-by-Department-of-Health.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

2018-0062-Response-by-East-Midlands-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust.pdf ↗· East Midlands Ambulance Service

Stated action · May 2018

“The EMAS emergency operations centre (EOC) has in place a structured triage and escalation system to ensure that patient safety is embedded across the call handling and dispatch systems.”

2018-0062-Response-by-HSIB.pdf ↗· Department of Health and Social Care

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error