Skip to content
recurance

Elliott Bignall

23 Mar 2015 · Coroner Penelope Schofield · West Sussex

A similar concern from this report was raised again 2 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. inadequate signage and poor lighting at foot crossing

    “the location of the foot crossing was poorly lit and there was inadequate signage at the site warning pedestrians of the dangers associated with the crossings”

Linked reports

Raised again laterSarah Athersmith30 Nov 2017 · 2 years 8 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“the location of the foot crossing was poorly lit and there was inadequate signage at the site warning pedestrians of the dangers associated with the crossings”

Later report

“Evidence emerged during the inquest that the Wallows Lane level crossing is an unprotected crossing and there is no method of warning of an approaching train”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate signage and lighting at foot crossing
Raised again laterAndrew Hanahoe19 Jun 2018 · 3 years 3 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.80 · moderate

This report

“the location of the foot crossing was poorly lit and there was inadequate signage at the site warning pedestrians of the dangers associated with the crossings.”

Later report

“Ideally this foot crossing should be closed. It crosses railway line that have trains regularly passing over it at speeds up to 125 mph.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Inadequate signage and lighting at foot crossing

Responses

No published response was found on judiciary.uk.

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error