Skip to content
recurance

Edward Mallaby

10 Dec 2020 · Coroner Derek Winter · Sunderland

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. hazardous personal property

    “1. There was no clear policy with the handling of residents' personal property which may be hazardous. In particular, if the television could not be immediately fitted or stored securely, then the family should be told to arrange another time for it to be Civic”
  2. 2. sensor mat failure

    “Ifa sensor mat was fitted it then it did not activate to alert staff that the deceased was out of bed. 3”
  3. 3. delayed detection of incident

    “Staff only discovered the deceased "with the TV Box on the top of his legs" on a routine check rather than by a sensor mat or personal alarm call.”
  4. 4. unclear observation protocol

    “Although the deceased had a falls risk assessment, it was not clear whether he was subject to hourly or half hourly observations, or whether the door to his room was to be open or not.”
  5. 5. lack of rapid learning

    “There appeared to be no rapid learning exercise to ensure that other residents were not at any ongoing risk.”
  6. 6. incomplete policy review

    “A full review of policy and procedure with associated training was apparently underway but without a deadline for completion.”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error

Edward Mallaby · Recurance