Skip to content
recurance

Edward Cowey

14 Oct 2020 · Coroner Emma Serrano · Derby and Derbyshire

This report repeats 1 earlier warning, and was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of integrated transfer information

    “Evidence emerged during the inquest 1. That patient electronic and paper based transfer information is not kept on one database. Mr [name redacted]' handover notes were kept on extra Med, his neurological observations on Patient Track and the falls form on his hard copy notes;”
  2. 2. inconsistent local head injury policy

    “Trust local policy regarding treatment for head injures is not consistent with NICE Guidelines and doctors cannot be expected to be aware of all trust local policies;”
  3. 3. inadequate anticoagulation guidance

    “Anticoagulation guideless do not cover a situation where anticoagulation is being given as a preventative measure as opposed to a treatment;”
  4. 4. falls form lacks guidance direction

    “The Trusts local falls form does not direct doctors to the relevant guidance regarding head injuries simply asks if a CT head scans indicated”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningMaureen Brown4 Feb 2020 · 8 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

Earlier report

“Evidence emerged during the inquest that the electronic transfer information is the only information that the receiving ward is given before a patient is transferred.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“Evidence emerged during the inquest 1. That patient electronic and paper based transfer information is not kept on one database.”
Full chain: Incomplete patient transfer information
Raised again laterKenneth Perkins18 Oct 2022 · 2 years later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“That patient electronic and paper based transfer information is not kept on one database.”

Later report

“There was no clear detailed handover or transfer document which would have detailed his medication, medical history and history of recurrent falls”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Fragmented transfer information across records

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error