Skip to content
recurance

Donald Spooner

5 May 2014 · Coroner Karen Henderson · West Sussex

A similar concern from this report was raised again 1 time later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. not wearing protective helmet on motorised bicycle

    “That it is not compulsory to wear a suitable protective helmet whilst travelling on a motorised bicycle which can reach speeds in excess of 15 MPH”

Linked reports

Raised again laterColin Wellings5 Oct 2016 · 2 years 5 months later
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“That it is not compulsory to wear a suitable protective helmet whilst travelling on a motorised bicycle which can reach speeds in excess of 15 MPH”

Later report

“(1) The machine that the deceased was riding was a domestically manufactured machine with a 3.5 litre engine registered in 1973 and as such was exempt from the requirement for the driver/rider to wear either a seatbelt or a protective helmet.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Helmet not required for motorised bicycles and trikes

Responses

2014-0208-Response-by-the-ROSPA.pdf ↗· Department for Transport

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error