David Morris
4 Jul 2024 · Coroner Graeme Irvine · East London
This report repeats 5 earlier warnings. See the linked reports.
The coroner's concerns
1. delayed cancer diagnosis and treatment
“Mr [name redacted] diagnosis and treatment for cancer was delayed due to poor organisation and communication at the Trust.”
2. delayed sepsis treatment
“During the evening of 3rd May 2022 going into the early hours of 4th May 2022, Doctors and nurses failed to identify the extent of Mr [name redacted] gastrostomy leak and the onset of sepsis. After identifying symptoms of sepsis, staff failed to treat and escalate Mr [name redacted] care resulting in a delay of three and a half hours before a medical review commenced emergency treatment.”
3. inadequate clinical records
“During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent. The absence of clear records impeded the effective investigation of this death by the Trust's governance teams and the Coroner.”
4. unfit investigation report
“The initial serious investigation report into Mr [name redacted] death was unfit for purpose. The report to investigate or even identify the Registrar who reviewed Mr [name redacted] on the evening of 3rd May 2022. Since then, no effective review has been undertaken by the Trust upon how this deficient report gained executive approval.”
5. lack of controlled drug management systems
“The Trust did not have effective controlled drug management systems in place to detect a prolonged and persistent course of conduct from an employed nurse who was stealing and self- administering controlled drugs in the workplace.”
Linked reports
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
Earlier report
“The recognition and treatment of sepsis as per national guidelines”
This report
“During the evening of 3rd May 2022 going into the early hours of 4th May 2022, Doctors and nurses failed to identify the extent of Mr [name redacted] gastrostomy leak and the onset of sepsis.”
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
Earlier report
“Clinical records were poorly maintained, exacerbating the lapses in communication between those treating Mr [name redacted].”
This report
“During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent.”
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high
Earlier report
“Clinical records were poorly maintained , resulting in an unclear picture of fluid administration.”
This report
“During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent.”
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
Earlier report
“The poor quality of recording clinical records impeded the Trust's governance processes”
This report
“During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent.”
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high
Earlier report
“The trust's clinical records were of a particularly poor standard which impeded the Trust's governance investigation and the inquest investigation”
This report
“During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent. The absence of clear records impeded the effective investigation”
Responses
2024-0360-Response-from-Barking-Havering-and-Redbridge-NHS-Trust.pdf ↗· Barking
Stated action · 30 September 2024
“no patients that are currently on a Patient Tracker List for any cancer diagnosis can be removed or deferred without approval of the responsible consultant”
Stated action · April 2024
“Critical Care Outreach Team (CCOT) model since April 2024.”
Stated action · October 2023
“Patient Safety Investigation Response Framework (PSIRF) which uses multidisciplinary investigations and reviews with multiple responsible authors.”
2024-0360-Response-from-DHSC.pdf ↗· Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
Stated action
“The CQC has confirmed that they are reviewing this case, and will consider what further action should be taken, and whether any monitoring of the trust, or regulatory response, is required.”
2024-0360-Response-from-MHRA.pdf ↗· Havering and Redbridge University Trust
Stated action
“be able to check the wording in their specific product information to ensure the appropriate advice on checking for leaks is present.”