Skip to content
recurance

David Morris

4 Jul 2024 · Coroner Graeme Irvine · East London

This report repeats 5 earlier warnings. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. delayed cancer diagnosis and treatment

    “Mr [name redacted] diagnosis and treatment for cancer was delayed due to poor organisation and communication at the Trust.”
  2. 2. delayed sepsis treatment

    “During the evening of 3rd May 2022 going into the early hours of 4th May 2022, Doctors and nurses failed to identify the extent of Mr [name redacted] gastrostomy leak and the onset of sepsis. After identifying symptoms of sepsis, staff failed to treat and escalate Mr [name redacted] care resulting in a delay of three and a half hours before a medical review commenced emergency treatment.”
  3. 3. inadequate clinical records

    “During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent. The absence of clear records impeded the effective investigation of this death by the Trust's governance teams and the Coroner.”
  4. 4. unfit investigation report

    “The initial serious investigation report into Mr [name redacted] death was unfit for purpose. The report to investigate or even identify the Registrar who reviewed Mr [name redacted] on the evening of 3rd May 2022. Since then, no effective review has been undertaken by the Trust upon how this deficient report gained executive approval.”
  5. 5. lack of controlled drug management systems

    “The Trust did not have effective controlled drug management systems in place to detect a prolonged and persistent course of conduct from an employed nurse who was stealing and self- administering controlled drugs in the workplace.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningMaria Lopes11 Jul 2014 · 10 years earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The recognition and treatment of sepsis as per national guidelines”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“During the evening of 3rd May 2022 going into the early hours of 4th May 2022, Doctors and nurses failed to identify the extent of Mr [name redacted] gastrostomy leak and the onset of sepsis.”
Full chain: Recurring hazard (see the quoted concerns)
Repeats an earlier warningPeter Ross4 Nov 2022 · 1 year 8 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“Clinical records were poorly maintained, exacerbating the lapses in communication between those treating Mr [name redacted].”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent.”
Full chain: Inadequate clinical records hinder investigations
Repeats an earlier warningGeorge Kearsey9 Feb 2023 · 1 year 5 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“Clinical records were poorly maintained , resulting in an unclear picture of fluid administration.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent.”
Full chain: Inadequate clinical records hinder investigations
Repeats an earlier warningIris Fordham5 Oct 2023 · 9 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The poor quality of recording clinical records impeded the Trust's governance processes”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent.”
Full chain: Inadequate clinical records hinder investigations
Repeats an earlier warningThomas Doyle20 Oct 2023 · 8 months earlier
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The trust's clinical records were of a particularly poor standard which impeded the Trust's governance investigation and the inquest investigation”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“During Mr [name redacted] ward-based treatment on 3 & 4th May 2022 clinical records were either of a poor standard or were non-existent. The absence of clear records impeded the effective investigation”
Full chain: Inadequate clinical records hinder investigations

Responses

2024-0360-Response-from-Barking-Havering-and-Redbridge-NHS-Trust.pdf ↗· Barking

Stated action · 30 September 2024

“no patients that are currently on a Patient Tracker List for any cancer diagnosis can be removed or deferred without approval of the responsible consultant”

Stated action · April 2024

“Critical Care Outreach Team (CCOT) model since April 2024.”

Stated action · October 2023

“Patient Safety Investigation Response Framework (PSIRF) which uses multidisciplinary investigations and reviews with multiple responsible authors.”

2024-0360-Response-from-DHSC.pdf ↗· Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

Stated action

“The CQC has confirmed that they are reviewing this case, and will consider what further action should be taken, and whether any monitoring of the trust, or regulatory response, is required.”

2024-0360-Response-from-MHRA.pdf ↗· Havering and Redbridge University Trust

Stated action

“be able to check the wording in their specific product information to ensure the appropriate advice on checking for leaks is present.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error