Skip to content
recurance

David Fenn

27 Feb 2026 · Coroner Lincoln Brookes · Essex

This report repeats 1 earlier warning. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. sepsis not recognised and Sepsis 6 pathway not followed

    “Signs of sepsis where not appropriately recognised and the Sepsis 6 Pathway was not followed”
  2. 2. lack of early consultant review

    “An early Consultant [name redacted] was not sought”
  3. 3. communication breakdown due to poor mobile signal

    “The later attempt to seek the Consultant's views was hampered by the use of a mobile phone which had poor signal in the operating theatre and crucial information was not fully imparted/understood”
  4. 4. junior doctor reluctance to challenge consultant

    “The junior doctor did not feel able to challenge the view of the Consultant to discharge nor did they seek to reapproach them with fuller information”
  5. 5. failure to obtain alternative consultant opinion

    “An alternative Consultant's opinion was not sought”
  6. 6. missed multidisciplinary team discussion

    “The Multi Disciplinary Team meeting the following morning did not discuss Mr [name redacted] case when it should have”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningJune Parlour28 Sept 2020 · 5 years 5 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.85 · high

Earlier report

“The nurse did not feel confident enough to challenge the prescription (as she perceived it) effectively or escalate / refer to another doctor.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“The junior doctor did not feel able to challenge the view of the Consultant to discharge nor did they seek to reapproach them with fuller information.”
Full chain: Junior staff reluctance to challenge senior clinicians

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error