Skip to content
recurance

Robert Stuart and Darren Hughes

18 Dec 2014 · Coroner Christopher Woolley · Cardiff & the Vale of Glamorgan

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. incomplete donor data form

    “The core donor data form could have contained more information as to the second lumbar test performed on the donor and could have given the results of the first lumbar puncture test”
  2. 2. untransmitted microbiology report

    “There was information available on the medical microbiology report which was not passed on to the accepting transplant centre”
  3. 3. telephone acceptance without EOS system

    “The Kidneys were accepted by the transplant centre following a telephone conversation between the consultant and the transplant coordinator”
  4. 4. solo acceptance decision

    “The kidneys were accepted by the consultant acting alone”
  5. 5. unsuitable standard consent form

    “The Coroner heard that a standard consent form is used for all operations, and heard evidence that this has proved unsatisfactory for transplant operations where issues have to be covered that are not catered for by the standard form”

Responses

  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error