Skip to content
recurance

Chloe Hunt

19 Jun 2024 · Coroner Sonia Hayes · Essex

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of consideration of trauma history in treatment planning

    “[the deceased] explained on 11 March 2022 in Accident & Emergency to the doctor her background of complex trauma and how difficult she found it to be in hospital. This was not factored into a plan for treatment.”
  2. 2. inadequate planning for pen removal procedure

    “Imaging established [the deceased] had swallowed 3 full-sized pens, 2 free in her stomach and 1 was impacted in her duodenum. There was a lack of consideration of the complexities of removal to guide whether the removal should be endoscopic or surgical. Endoscopy could not be converted into a procedure under anaesthetic in the interventional radiology suite.”
  3. 3. failure to account for procedural risks and patient tolerance

    “The requirement for reintubation after each pen removal and the difficulty for a patient to tolerate multiple procedures without anaesthetic was not considered for [the deceased] on referral for removal, or whether this might need to be converted to a procedure under anaesthetic.”
  4. 4. delayed response to clinical deterioration

    “There was a lack of urgency in treating [the deceased] and lack of recognition of her deteriorating clinical condition.”
  5. 5. failure to investigate cause of vital sign abnormalities

    “[the deceased] was tachycardic throughout her admission with low blood pressure and there was no investigation of the underlying cause in a young otherwise physically healthy woman. NEWS Scores should not replace consideration of the whole clinical picture for a patient.”
  6. 6. failure to recognise clinical deterioration signs

    “In the hours before [the deceased]'s death, she required oxygen for the first-time that was administered for approximately 75 minutes and [the deceased]'s heart rate reduced to normal for several hours for the first time in her admission. This reduction was not sustained, and her heart rated elevated later. These changes were not recognised as signs [the deceased] was a deteriorating patient”

Responses

2024-0329-Response-from-East-Suffolk-and-North-Essex-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf ↗· East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust

Stated action

“The Trust has however acknowledged that the low saturations were not recorded in the notes. This learning point has been circulated to staff members, through the daily ward huddle, reiterating the need for oxygen saturations to be recorded prior to the administration of oxygen.”

2024-0329-Response-from-NHS-England.pdf ↗· NHS England

Stated action · 12 August 2024

“We also note that they are taking actions to ensure there will always be a member of staff on shift with Immediate Life Support training.”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error