Skip to content
recurance

Chloe Every

25 Oct 2024 · Coroner Graeme Irvine · East London

This report repeats 2 earlier warnings, and was raised again 2 times later. See the linked reports.

The coroner's concerns

  1. 1. lack of nursing cover during weekends and holidays for staff with relevant learning disability training

    “The Trust does not provide nursing cover during weekends and holiday periods of staff with relevant learning disability training.”
  2. 2. absence of contemporary nursing and medical notes

    “The investigation of this inquest was prejudiced by the absence of contemporary nursing and medical notes from various stages of [the deceased]'s treatment. The extent of these lapses meant staff who made important treatment decisions could not be identified, and where staff could be identified, no contemporary account of their rationale for making treatment decisions could be located.”
  3. 3. irregular clinical observations

    “The regularity of [the deceased]'s clinical observations fell well below the expected level. The lapses included a period of over 10 hours in which no observations were undertaken.”
  4. 4. enema performed without informed consent on unconscious patient

    “[the deceased] underwent an enema on 8th May 2019 without informed consent being taken. The court found that [the deceased] was unconscious, before, during, and after the procedure, it is possible this procedure contributed to her death.”
  5. 5. inability to explain CPR criteria

    “Nursing staff were incapable of explaining to the court the appropriate criteria that would have to exist before commencing CPR on an unresponsive patient.”
  6. 6. governance failure to identify patient safety incident

    “Governance processes at the Trust failed to identify that [the deceased]'s death constituted a patient safety incident until months after her death. A mortality review authored by the Associate Medical Director on 17th May 2019 assessed [the deceased]'s care as good or excellent.”

Linked reports

Repeats an earlier warningEvelyn Ross27 Apr 2020 · 4 years 6 months earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“During the course of the inquest the documentation relied on by the trust was lacking in detail and meant that it was difficult to understand her condition at key points or to understand the rationale for decisions.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“The investigation of this inquest was prejudiced by the absence of contemporary nursing and medical notes from various stages of [the deceased]'s treatment. The extent of these lapses meant staff who made important treatment decisions could not be identified, and where staff could be identified, no contemporary account of their rationale for making treatment decisions could be located.”
Full chain: Inadequate clinical documentation of patient condition and decisions
Repeats an earlier warningThomas Doyle20 Oct 2023 · 1 year earlier
Closely relatedConfidence 0.90 · high

Earlier report

“The trust's clinical records were of a particularly poor standard which impeded the Trust's governance investigation and the inquest investigation in determining what, if any consideration was given to the possibility that Mr [name redacted] was suffering from an infection.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗

This report

“The investigation of this inquest was prejudiced by the absence of contemporary nursing and medical notes from various stages of [the deceased]'s treatment.”
Full chain: Inadequate clinical records hinder investigations
Raised again laterKenneth Foster12 May 2025 · 7 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“Governance processes at the Trust failed to identify that [the deceased]'s death constituted a patient safety incident until months after her death.”

Later report

“A failure in governance at the Trust meant that this case was not identified as an incident worthy of investigation through the Patient Safety Framework.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Governance failure in incident identification
Raised again laterTony Jackson23 Sept 2025 · 11 months later
Identical hazardConfidence 0.90 · high

This report

“Governance processes at the Trust failed to identify that [the deceased]'s death constituted a patient safety incident until months after her death.”

Later report

“A failure in governance at the Trust meant that this case was not identified as an incident worthy of investigation through the Patient Safety Framework.”
Original on judiciary.uk ↗
Full chain: Governance failure in incident identification

Responses

2024-0578-Response-from-Barking-Havering-and-Redbridge-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf ↗· Barking

Stated action

“the Trust has put mitigations in place. The Trust provides mandatory training for all staff including both nursing and medical staff related to the care of patients with a Learning Disability.”

2024-0578-Response-from-DHSC.pdf ↗· Barking

Stated action · 2025

“BHRUT plan to recruit more learning disability nurses in 2025. They have created pathways to encourage and upskill existing staff due to the shortage of nurses going into learning disability training (RNLD).”
  • Built with
  • NVIDIA Nemotron Nano, Super and Ultra
  • Nebius Token Factory inference
  • Qwen3 Embedding 8B on Token Factory
  • Tavily follow-up web search
  • Postgres and pgvector search
  • Next.js site

Source: Prevention of Future Deaths reports and responses published by the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary at judiciary.uk. Crown copyright, used under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Data updated 26 Oct 2026.

A link shows that a similar concern was raised again, not why. It is not a finding about any organisation or person. Methodology and responsible use · Report an error